8 Cited authorities

  1. Tibbs v. Florida

    457 U.S. 31 (1982)   Cited 3,908 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the state court's determination regarding whether a conviction was overturned based evidentiary weight, or evidentiary sufficiency, was binding on the Court
  2. People v. Williams

    45 Cal.3d 1268 (Cal. 1988)   Cited 574 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding proper a court's refusal of a similar instruction on the same ground
  3. People v. Marshall

    50 Cal.3d 907 (Cal. 1990)   Cited 536 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Marshall, the jury was instructed: "[The defendant] was 18 years old when he committed the crimes of which you have found him guilty. [¶] If defendant had been under 18 years old when the crimes were committed, he would be subject to neither life imprisonment without possibility of parole nor the death penalty."
  4. People v. Rodriguez

    42 Cal.3d 730 (Cal. 1986)   Cited 545 times
    Holding constitutional the special circumstance of peace officer murder under section 190.2, subdivision, which applies to a defendant who has intentionally killed another who the defendant "reasonably should have known" was a peace officer engaged in the performance of official duty
  5. People v. Ghent

    43 Cal.3d 739 (Cal. 1987)   Cited 398 times
    Finding unconstitutional a psychiatrist's attempt to interview defendant after invocation of right to counsel
  6. People v. Frierson

    53 Cal.3d 730 (Cal. 1991)   Cited 287 times
    In People v. Frierson (1991) 53 Cal.3d 730, 742, 280 Cal.Rptr. 440, 808 P.2d 1197, we held that a motion for self-representation made two days before the set trial date was made on "the eve of trial" and thus untimely.
  7. People v. Crew

    1 Cal.App.4th 1591 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)   Cited 11 times

    Docket No. H006959. December 23, 1991. Appeal from Superior Court of Santa Clara County, No. 101400, John Schatz, Jr., Judge. COUNSEL Leo Himmelsbach, District Attorney, David N. Davies, Assistant District Attorney, and Thang Nguyen Barrett, Deputy District Attorney, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Thomas Lundy for Defendant and Respondent. OPINION CAPACCIOLI, Acting P.J. — Summary The People appeal after the trial court granted an automatic motion to modify the jury's verdict of death to one of life

  8. People v. Hatch

    66 Cal.App.4th 1510 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)

    B112071 B112073 (Super. Ct. Nos. NA029743 NA031502) Filed October 2, 1998 REVIEW GRANTED Reprinted without change in the Review Granted Opinions Pamphlet to permit tracking pending review and disposition by the Supreme Court.