20 Cited authorities

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (1984) Cited 135,742 times 173 Legal Analyses
Holding that prejudice for IAC claims requires showing "that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different"
Mickens v. Taylor
535 U.S. 162 (2002) Cited 1,562 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that he denial of habeas relief must be affirmed where petitioner fails "to establish that the conflict of interest adversely affected his counsel's performance"
Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co.
556 U.S. 868 (2009) Cited 626 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding that state-court-appellate judge should have recused himself from appeal as matter of due process
People v. Doolin
45 Cal.4th 390 (Cal. 2009) Cited 2,609 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding defendant's request to represent himself was untimely where he sought self-representation at sentencing hearing only after his Marsden motion was denied
People v. Sanchez
63 Cal.4th 665 (Cal. 2016) Cited 1,063 times
Holding that case-specific out-of-court statements offered by an expert and not otherwise admissible are necessarily offered for their truth, in violation of the Confrontation Clause
Williams v. Pennsylvania
136 S. Ct. 1899 (2016) Cited 235 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that Chief Justice Castille was obligated to recuse himself where he had "significant, personal involvement as a prosecutor in a critical decision regarding the defendant's case"
People v. Gardeley
14 Cal.4th 605 (Cal. 1996) Cited 1,320 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that expert testimony by police officer based on conversations with defendants, Family Crip members, personal investigations of crimes committed by gang members, and information from colleagues and law enforcement organizations was admissible and gave jury sufficient grounds to find that group constituted a "criminal street gang" defined as an ongoing organization of three or more persons that shares a common name or identifying symbol and has as one of its primary activities the commission of one or more enumerated crimes
People v. Harris
57 Cal.4th 804 (Cal. 2013) Cited 350 times
Finding no abuse of discretion in denying the defendant's motion for individual sequestered voir dire on race
People v. Barnwell
41 Cal.4th 1038 (Cal. 2007) Cited 398 times
Holding that the testimony of a single witness that satisfied the substantial evidence standard is sufficient to uphold the jury's finding
People v. Dungo
55 Cal.4th 608 (Cal. 2012) Cited 306 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding facts recorded in autopsy report non-testimonial and allowing testimony of supervisor regarding those facts

PEOPLE v. PEREZ

20 Cited authorities

Holding that prejudice for IAC claims requires showing "that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different"

Holding that he denial of habeas relief must be affirmed where petitioner fails "to establish that the conflict of interest adversely affected his counsel's performance"

Holding that state-court-appellate judge should have recused himself from appeal as matter of due process

Holding defendant's request to represent himself was untimely where he sought self-representation at sentencing hearing only after his Marsden motion was denied

Holding that case-specific out-of-court statements offered by an expert and not otherwise admissible are necessarily offered for their truth, in violation of the Confrontation Clause

Holding that Chief Justice Castille was obligated to recuse himself where he had "significant, personal involvement as a prosecutor in a critical decision regarding the defendant's case"

Finding no abuse of discretion in denying the defendant's motion for individual sequestered voir dire on race

Holding that the testimony of a single witness that satisfied the substantial evidence standard is sufficient to uphold the jury's finding

Holding facts recorded in autopsy report non-testimonial and allowing testimony of supervisor regarding those facts