20 Cited authorities

  1. Strickland v. Washington

    466 U.S. 668 (1984)   Cited 134,775 times   173 Legal Analyses
    Holding that prejudice for IAC claims requires showing "that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different"
  2. Mickens v. Taylor

    535 U.S. 162 (2002)   Cited 1,540 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that he denial of habeas relief must be affirmed where petitioner fails "to establish that the conflict of interest adversely affected his counsel's performance"
  3. Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co.

    556 U.S. 868 (2009)   Cited 610 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that state-court-appellate judge should have recused himself from appeal as matter of due process
  4. People v. Doolin

    45 Cal.4th 390 (Cal. 2009)   Cited 2,595 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the state's lump-sum compensation agreement did not create a conflict of interest between the defendant and his attorney
  5. People v. Sanchez

    63 Cal.4th 665 (Cal. 2016)   Cited 1,026 times
    Holding that case-specific out-of-court statements offered by an expert and not otherwise admissible are necessarily offered for their truth, in violation of the Confrontation Clause
  6. Williams v. Pennsylvania

    136 S. Ct. 1899 (2016)   Cited 239 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Chief Justice Castille was obligated to recuse himself where he had "significant, personal involvement as a prosecutor in a critical decision regarding the defendant's case"
  7. People v. Gardeley

    14 Cal.4th 605 (Cal. 1996)   Cited 1,320 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that expert testimony by police officer based on conversations with defendants, Family Crip members, personal investigations of crimes committed by gang members, and information from colleagues and law enforcement organizations was admissible and gave jury sufficient grounds to find that group constituted a "criminal street gang" defined as an ongoing organization of three or more persons that shares a common name or identifying symbol and has as one of its primary activities the commission of one or more enumerated crimes
  8. People v. Harris

    57 Cal.4th 804 (Cal. 2013)   Cited 348 times
    Finding no abuse of discretion in denying the defendant's motion for individual sequestered voir dire on race
  9. People v. Barnwell

    41 Cal.4th 1038 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 396 times
    In People v. Barnwell,supra, 41 Cal.4th at page 1052, we held that the basis for a juror's disqualification must appear on the record as a "demonstrable reality."
  10. People v. Dungo

    55 Cal.4th 608 (Cal. 2012)   Cited 309 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding facts recorded in autopsy report non-testimonial and allowing testimony of supervisor regarding those facts