5 Cited authorities

  1. Crawford v. Washington

    541 U.S. 36 (2004)   Cited 14,253 times   80 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an absent witness's statements are admissible under the Confrontation Clause "only where the declarant is unavailable, and only where the defendant [] had a prior opportunity to cross-examine"
  2. Davis v. Washington

    547 U.S. 813 (2006)   Cited 3,758 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statements made "in the course of police interrogation" are testimonial when made under "circumstances objectively indicat[ing] ... that the primary purpose of the interrogation [was] to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution"
  3. Chapman v. California

    386 U.S. 18 (1967)   Cited 18,511 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that error is harmless only if "harmless beyond a reasonable doubt"
  4. People v. Cage

    40 Cal.4th 965 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 316 times
    Holding victim's identification of his assailant to treating physician who asked victim "what happened" was nontestimonial statement
  5. United States v. Ignasiak

    667 F.3d 1217 (11th Cir. 2012)   Cited 59 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an autopsy report was testimonial primarily because under statutory framework, Florida Medical Examiner's Office existed within Department of Law Enforcement