§Why CasetextPricing

PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS (JACK EMMIT)

Appellant’s Supplemental Brief

5 Cited authorities

  1. Gideon v. Wainwright

    372 U.S. 335 (1963)   Cited 8,386 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth Amendment requires counsel in all state felony prosecutions

  2. United States v. Bajakajian

    524 U.S. 321 (1998)   Cited 1,356 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that forfeiture 70 times the Guidelines maximum and greater than the statutory maximum would be unconstitutionally excessive

  3. People v. Vieira

    35 Cal.4th 264 (Cal. 2005)   Cited 872 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendant could not challenge district court's refusal to include particular question in jury questionnaire because defendant did not request such question

  4. People v. Ortiz

    51 Cal.3d 975 (Cal. 1990)   Cited 413 times
    Holding that "[t]he right to counsel of choice is one of the constitutional rights most basic to a fair trial."

  5. People v. Saelee

    35 Cal.App.4th 27 (Cal. Ct. App. 1995)   Cited 116 times
    Modifying restitution fine amount to correct ex post facto violation