§Why CasetextPricing

R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company v. Quark Inc. et al

REPLY to Response to Motion re MOTION to Compel Defendants' Answer to Plaintiff's Interrogatory Number 21

2 Cited authorities

  1. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. U.S. Plywood Corp.

    318 F. Supp. 1116 (S.D.N.Y. 1970)   Cited 741 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Finding that “royalties received by the patentee for the licensing of the patent in suit” is a relevant factor for the jury to consider

  2. Tesseron, Ltd. v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co.

    CASE NO. 1:06 CV 2909 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 10, 2007)   Cited 6 times
    Applying similar standard