29 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 260,930 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 274,322 times   368 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
  3. Papasan v. Allain

    478 U.S. 265 (1986)   Cited 17,146 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Ex parte Young would not support a suit against a state for ongoing liability for an alleged past breach of trust, since "continuing payment of the income from the lost corpus is essentially equivalent in economic terms to a one-time restoration of the lost corpus itself"
  4. Imbler v. Pachtman

    424 U.S. 409 (1976)   Cited 10,821 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding prosecutors absolutely immune from damages liability for having knowingly presented perjured witness testimony against criminal defendants, observing that the "veracity of witnesses in criminal cases frequently is subject to doubt before and after they testify . . . . If prosecutors were hampered in exercising their judgment as to the use of such witnesses by concern about resulting personal liability, [they often would refrain from calling such witnesses and hence] the triers of fact in criminal cases often would be denied relevant evidence"
  5. RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Cmty.

    136 S. Ct. 2090 (2016)   Cited 379 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the term "foreign commerce" in the RICO statute restricts the reach of the law to enterprises that "engage in, or affect in some significant way, commerce directly involving the United States—e.g., commerce between the United States and a foreign country"
  6. Stirone v. United States

    361 U.S. 212 (1960)   Cited 1,804 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding courts must assume "that under an indictment drawn in general terms a conviction might rest upon a showing" under those general terms
  7. Tonkovich v. Kansas Board of Regents

    159 F.3d 504 (10th Cir. 1998)   Cited 855 times
    Holding that district court's analysis of plaintiff's constitutional claims was "infirm because it lump[ed] all of [the defendants] together despite the fact that each of the defendants had different powers and duties and took different actions with respect to [plaintiff]"
  8. Bixler v. Foster

    596 F.3d 751 (10th Cir. 2010)   Cited 531 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding "[t]o survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face"
  9. Sil-Flo, Inc. v. SFHC, Inc.

    917 F.2d 1507 (10th Cir. 1990)   Cited 538 times
    Holding that the court of appeals "need not ‘sift through’ the record to find [the appellant’s] evidence" in the absence of citations in the appellant’s brief
  10. Bancoklahoma Mortg. v. Capital Title Co.

    194 F.3d 1089 (10th Cir. 1999)   Cited 273 times
    Holding the rule from Klaxton “also applies when a federal court exercises supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims in a federal question lawsuit”
  11. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 160,697 times   196 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  12. Section 1962 - Prohibited activities

    18 U.S.C. § 1962   Cited 16,119 times   60 Legal Analyses
    Specifying prohibited activities
  13. Section 1961 - Definitions

    18 U.S.C. § 1961   Cited 15,106 times   72 Legal Analyses
    Defining what the terms “person” and “enterprise” include
  14. Section 1343 - Fraud by wire, radio, or television

    18 U.S.C. § 1343   Cited 12,330 times   172 Legal Analyses
    Barring fraudulent schemes "for obtaining money or property"
  15. Section 1951 - Interference with commerce by threats or violence

    18 U.S.C. § 1951   Cited 11,843 times   51 Legal Analyses
    Defining extortion in ACCA as “the obtaining of something of value from another, with his consent, induced by the wrongful use or threatened use of force against the person or property of another ”
  16. Section 1503 - Influencing or injuring officer or juror generally

    18 U.S.C. § 1503   Cited 2,534 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Relating to obstruction of justice
  17. Section 201 - Bribery of public officials and witnesses

    18 U.S.C. § 201   Cited 1,879 times   94 Legal Analyses
    Using "proceeding" to refer to trials, hearings, or the like "before any court, any committee of either House or both Houses of Congress, or any agency, commission, or officer"
  18. Section 30-16-9 - Extortion

    N.M. Stat. § 30-16-9   Cited 16 times

    Extortion consists of the communication or transmission of any threat to another by any means whatsoever with intent thereby to wrongfully obtain anything of value or to wrongfully compell [compel] the person threatened to do or refrain from doing any act against his will. Any of the following acts shall be sufficient to constitute a threat under this section: A. a threat to do an unlawful injury to the person or property of the person threatened or of another; B. a threat to accuse the person threatened

  19. Section 30-24-1 - Bribery of public officer or public employee

    N.M. Stat. § 30-24-1   Cited 6 times
    Bribing a public official is a third degree felony