23 Cited authorities

  1. Hevesi v. Citigroup Inc.

    366 F.3d 70 (2d Cir. 2004)   Cited 120 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs fail to establish predominance requirement if they are not entitled to presumption of reliance
  2. In re eSpeed, Inc. Securities Litigation

    232 F.R.D. 95 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)   Cited 103 times
    Holding that "a group of unrelated investors should not be considered as lead plaintiff when that group would displace the institutional investor preferred by the PSLRA"
  3. In re Network Associates, Inc., Securities Litigation

    76 F. Supp. 2d 1017 (N.D. Cal. 1999)   Cited 96 times
    Holding that "lead plaintiff owes a fiduciary duty to obtain the highest quality legal representation at the lowest price"
  4. Constance Sczesny Trust v. KPMG LLP

    223 F.R.D. 319 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)   Cited 62 times
    Noting that the court has discretion to appoint more than one lead plaintiff and t aggregate losses suffered by a court-appointed group of investors
  5. In re Bank of America Corp. Securities, Derivative and Erisa Litigation

    258 F.R.D. 260 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)   Cited 47 times
    Rejecting argument that lead plaintiff would prioritize Section 10(b) claims over Section 14 claims, as "no actual conflict of interest has been shown"
  6. Sgalambo v. McKenzie

    268 F.R.D. 170 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)   Cited 26 times
    Holding plaintiff seeking lead plaintiff status need only make “preliminary showing” that it will satisfy the typicality and adequacy requirements of Rule 23
  7. In re Tronox, Inc. Securities Litigation

    262 F.R.D. 338 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)   Cited 25 times
    Finding that purchases following partial corrective disclosures that do not “sufficiently correct ... prior false and misleading statements” do not render proposed lead plaintiff atypical.
  8. In re Doral Financial Corp. Securities Litigation

    414 F. Supp. 2d 398 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)   Cited 27 times
    Holding that a 17% difference in losses was "roughly equal"
  9. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. v. Tellabs, Inc.

    256 F.R.D. 586 (N.D. Ill. 2009)   Cited 22 times
    Holding that arguments that an intermediate statement revealed the truth and undermined the presumption of reliance after that date was a question on the merits that did not impact the predominance inquiry
  10. In re Critical Path, Inc. Securities Litigation

    156 F. Supp. 2d 1102 (N.D. Cal. 2001)   Cited 31 times
    Finding net shares purchased "determinative" of financial interest
  11. Rule 23 - Class Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 23   Cited 28,069 times   1148 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"
  12. Section 78u-4 - Private securities litigation

    15 U.S.C. § 78u-4   Cited 6,294 times   42 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts authority to permit discovery if necessary "to preserve evidence or to prevent undue prejudice to" a party