54 Cited authorities

Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Envtl. Servs. (TOC), Inc.
528 U.S. 167 (2000) Cited 7,126 times 25 Legal Analyses
Holding that plaintiffs who curtailed their recreational activities on a river due to reasonable concerns about the effect of pollutant discharges into that river had standing
Irwin v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs
498 U.S. 89 (1990) Cited 4,537 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that a statutory time limit with the same characteristics is subject to equitable tolling
Hunt v. Washington Apple Advertising Comm'n
432 U.S. 333 (1977) Cited 4,427 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that North Carolina's statute banning state grading of apples was discriminatory even though six other states also had no state grading
Federal Election Comm'n v. Akins
524 U.S. 11 (1998) Cited 778 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that inability to procure information to which Congress has created a right in the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 qualifies as concrete injury satisfying Article III's standing requirement
John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States
552 U.S. 130 (2008) Cited 542 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding § 2501 jurisdictional
Food Commercial Workers v. Brown Group
517 U.S. 544 (1996) Cited 665 times
Holding that an associational plaintiff need only demonstrate that "its members, or any one of them, are suffering immediate or threatened injury"
Public Citizen v. Department of Justice
491 U.S. 440 (1989) Cited 786 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that plaintiff advocacy organizations' inability to obtain information that Congress made subject to disclosure under the Federal Advisory Committee Act "constitutes a sufficiently distinct injury to provide standing to sue"
Miller v. Gammie
335 F.3d 889 (9th Cir. 2003) Cited 1,599 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that the court lacked jurisdiction over an order that "did not expressly deny the motion" but "deferred ruling on immunity"
Bonin v. Calderon
59 F.3d 815 (9th Cir. 1995) Cited 2,009 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding "that a district court does not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to amend where the movant presents no new facts but only new theories and provides no satisfactory explanation for his failure to fully develop his contentions originally"
Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Gaston Copper Recycling Corp.
204 F.3d 149 (4th Cir. 2000) Cited 376 times
Holding an injury "need not be large"—"an identifiable trifle will suffice"
Section 706 - Scope of review
5 U.S.C. § 706 Cited 20,401 times 183 Legal Analyses
Granting courts jurisdiction to "compel agency action unlawfully held or unreasonably delayed"
Section 2401 - Time for commencing action against United States
28 U.S.C. § 2401 Cited 6,182 times 26 Legal Analyses
Setting the limitations period at six years
Section 30502 - National Motor Vehicle Title Information System
49 U.S.C. § 30502 Cited 3 times
Providing that the Attorney General, "shall make available . . . to a prospective purchaser of an automobile on request of that purchaser . . . information in the System about that automobile."
Section 33109 - National Stolen Passenger Motor Vehicle Information System
49 U.S.C. § 33109 Cited 1 times
(a) GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.- (1) Not later than July 25, 1993, the Attorney General shall establish, and thereafter maintain, a National Stolen Passenger Motor Vehicle Information System containing the vehicle identification numbers of stolen passenger motor vehicles and stolen passenger motor vehicle parts. The System shall be located in the National Crime Information Center and shall include at least the following information on each passenger motor vehicle reported to a law enforcement authority

Public Citizen, Inc. et al v. Mukasey

54 Cited authorities

Holding that plaintiffs who curtailed their recreational activities on a river due to reasonable concerns about the effect of pollutant discharges into that river had standing

Holding that a statutory time limit with the same characteristics is subject to equitable tolling

Holding that North Carolina's statute banning state grading of apples was discriminatory even though six other states also had no state grading

Holding that inability to procure information to which Congress has created a right in the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 qualifies as concrete injury satisfying Article III's standing requirement

Holding § 2501 jurisdictional

Holding that an associational plaintiff need only demonstrate that "its members, or any one of them, are suffering immediate or threatened injury"

Holding that plaintiff advocacy organizations' inability to obtain information that Congress made subject to disclosure under the Federal Advisory Committee Act "constitutes a sufficiently distinct injury to provide standing to sue"

Holding that the court lacked jurisdiction over an order that "did not expressly deny the motion" but "deferred ruling on immunity"

Holding "that a district court does not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to amend where the movant presents no new facts but only new theories and provides no satisfactory explanation for his failure to fully develop his contentions originally"

Holding an injury "need not be large"—"an identifiable trifle will suffice"

Granting courts jurisdiction to "compel agency action unlawfully held or unreasonably delayed"

Setting the limitations period at six years

Providing that the Attorney General, "shall make available . . . to a prospective purchaser of an automobile on request of that purchaser . . . information in the System about that automobile."