31 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 251,520 times   279 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 265,488 times   364 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
  3. Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.

    561 U.S. 247 (2010)   Cited 1,455 times   177 Legal Analyses
    Holding extraterritorial application of a statute is a merits question, not a question of subject matter jurisdiction
  4. Von Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art

    578 F.3d 1016 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 1,180 times
    Holding that a court may take judicial notice of publications to establish what was in the public realm at the time
  5. Eclectic Properties East, LLC v. Marcus & Millichap Co.

    751 F.3d 990 (9th Cir. 2014)   Cited 448 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations are not plausible unless plaintiffs allege "facts tending to exclude the possibility that the [defendant's] explanation is true."
  6. Ove v. Gwinn

    264 F.3d 817 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 659 times
    Holding that district court may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over related state law claims once it has dismissed all claims over which it had original jurisdiction
  7. Sever v. Alaska Pulp Corp.

    978 F.2d 1529 (9th Cir. 1992)   Cited 567 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a former employee failed to state a RICO claim where multiple criminal predicate acts were "in a sense a single episode having the singular purpose of impoverishing [the plaintiff]" and there was "no suggestion that these defendants . . . ever intended anyone but [plaintiff] any harm"
  8. Howard v. America Online Inc.

    208 F.3d 741 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 385 times
    Holding that the RICO bar applies even where the plaintiff does not have standing to sue under securities laws because the plaintiff did not buy or sell securities
  9. Dreiling v. American Exp. Co.

    458 F.3d 942 (9th Cir. 2006)   Cited 134 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Reviewing eligibility for Rule 16b-3 exemption to Section 16(b) liability de novo
  10. Reich v. Lopez

    38 F. Supp. 3d 436 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)   Cited 101 times
    Holding that defendant's use of New York office space and New York banks, among other factors, "is not one of those rare instances" in which a defendant "is subjected to a state's general jurisdiction irrespective of where they are domiciled"
  11. Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 9   Cited 38,830 times   316 Legal Analyses
    Permitting "[m]alice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of a person's mind [to] be alleged generally"
  12. Rule 801 - Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay

    Fed. R. Evid. 801   Cited 19,054 times   75 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such a statement must merely be made by the party and offered against that party
  13. Section 1343 - Fraud by wire, radio, or television

    18 U.S.C. § 1343   Cited 11,893 times   167 Legal Analyses
    Barring fraudulent schemes "for obtaining money or property"
  14. Section 1956 - Laundering of monetary instruments

    18 U.S.C. § 1956   Cited 9,248 times   141 Legal Analyses
    Defining “specified unlawful activity” to include, inter alia, controlled substance violations, murder, bribery, smuggling, various forms of fraud, concealment of assets, various environmental offenses, and health care offenses
  15. Section 1952 - Interstate and foreign travel or transportation in aid of racketeering enterprises

    18 U.S.C. § 1952   Cited 3,258 times   42 Legal Analyses
    Making it illegal to travel in interstate commerce to further a gambling business that is illegal under applicable state law