78 Cited authorities

Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., Inc.
530 U.S. 133 (2000) Cited 21,065 times 22 Legal Analyses
Holding that, since the 58-year-old plaintiff was fired by his 60-year-old employer, there was an inference that "age discrimination was not the motive"
Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.
547 U.S. 388 (2006) Cited 3,776 times 130 Legal Analyses
Holding that traditional four-factor test applies to injunctions against patent infringement
Huddleston v. United States
485 U.S. 681 (1988) Cited 2,347 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that under Rule 104(b), the "court simply examines all the evidence in the case and decides whether the jury could reasonably find the conditional fact . . . by a preponderance of the evidence"
Greer v. Miller
483 U.S. 756 (1987) Cited 1,630 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding no Doyle violation occurs if the trial court sustains a timely objection to the allegedly improper question and instructs the jury to disregard that question
Weisgram v. Marley Co.
528 U.S. 440 (2000) Cited 348 times
Holding that a district court, when considering post-trial motions for judgment as a matter of law, may disregard "testimony erroneously admitted"
Lucent Technologies v. Gateway
580 F.3d 1301 (Fed. Cir. 2009) Cited 740 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding that "we see little evidentiary basis under Georgia-Pacific" for the damages award
Salinger v. Colting
607 F.3d 68 (2d Cir. 2010) Cited 593 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that eBay applies “with equal force” to preliminary injunctions in copyright cases
Honda Motor Co. v. Oberg
512 U.S. 415 (1994) Cited 278 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that denial of judicial review of punitive damages violates the Due Process Clause
Stewart v. Abend
495 U.S. 207 (1990) Cited 286 times 11 Legal Analyses
Holding that an author "may receive protection only for his original additions," not "elements ... already in the public domain"
Resqnet.com, Inc. v. Lansa, Inc.
594 F.3d 860 (Fed. Cir. 2010) Cited 298 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that evidence of royalty rates from licenses without a relationship to the claimed invention could not form the basis of a reasonable royalty calculation
Rule 401 - Test for Relevant Evidence
Fed. R. Evid. 401 Cited 13,350 times 34 Legal Analyses
Providing that evidence is relevant if " it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; and (b) the fact is of consequence in determining the action"
Section 504 - Remedies for infringement: Damages and profits
17 U.S.C. § 504 Cited 3,580 times 55 Legal Analyses
Stating that, where "infringement was committed willfully, the court in its discretion may increase the award of statutory damages to a sum of not more than $150,000"

Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

78 Cited authorities

Holding that, since the 58-year-old plaintiff was fired by his 60-year-old employer, there was an inference that "age discrimination was not the motive"

Holding that traditional four-factor test applies to injunctions against patent infringement

Holding that under Rule 104(b), the "court simply examines all the evidence in the case and decides whether the jury could reasonably find the conditional fact . . . by a preponderance of the evidence"

Holding no Doyle violation occurs if the trial court sustains a timely objection to the allegedly improper question and instructs the jury to disregard that question

Holding that a district court, when considering post-trial motions for judgment as a matter of law, may disregard "testimony erroneously admitted"

Holding that "we see little evidentiary basis under Georgia-Pacific" for the damages award

Holding that eBay applies “with equal force” to preliminary injunctions in copyright cases

Holding that denial of judicial review of punitive damages violates the Due Process Clause

Holding that an author "may receive protection only for his original additions," not "elements ... already in the public domain"

Holding that evidence of royalty rates from licenses without a relationship to the claimed invention could not form the basis of a reasonable royalty calculation

Providing that evidence is relevant if " it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; and (b) the fact is of consequence in determining the action"

Stating that, where "infringement was committed willfully, the court in its discretion may increase the award of statutory damages to a sum of not more than $150,000"