9 Cited authorities

  1. Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC

    220 F.R.D. 212 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)   Cited 679 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that destruction of evidence was "grossly negligent, if not reckless" where the defendant "failed to include [evidence from a key employee] in its preservation directive"
  2. Hill v. Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass'n

    7 Cal.4th 1 (Cal. 1994)   Cited 623 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that students' consent to drug tests as a condition of participating in athletics barred their privacy claims
  3. Cedars-Sinai Med. Ctr. v. Sup. Ct., Los Angeles Cty

    18 Cal.4th 1 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 311 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "there is no tort remedy for the intentional spoliation of evidence by a party to the cause of action to which the spoliated evidence is relevant, in cases in which, as here, the spoliation victim knows or should have known of the alleged spoliation before the trial or other decision on the merits of the underlying action."
  4. Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court

    56 Cal.2d 355 (Cal. 1961)   Cited 290 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Greyhound, the plaintiff in a personal injury suit arising from a car accident sought written statements that had been obtained from witnesses by the defendant's insurance adjusters and investigators.
  5. Flagship Theatres of Palm Desert, LLC v. Century Theatres, Inc.

    198 Cal.App.4th 1366 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 28 times
    Noting federal law's antitrust injury requirement applies to claims under the Cartwright Act
  6. Fairmont Ins. Co. v. Superior Court

    22 Cal.4th 245 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 38 times
    Affirming rule announced in Beverly Hospital
  7. Emerson Elec. Co. v. Superior Court

    16 Cal.4th 1101 (Cal. 1997)   Cited 31 times   3 Legal Analyses

    Docket No. S057119. December 1, 1997. Appeal from Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. MC006881, Ross Amspoker, Temporary Judge. Pursuant to California Constitution, article VI, section 21. COUNSEL Hennelly Grossfeld, John J. Hennelly and Susan J. Williams for Petitioners. Hugh F. Young, Jr., Jan S. Amundson, Harvey M. Grossman, Sherman Joyce, Crowell Moring, Victor E. Schwartz, Mark A. Behrens, Nabil W. Istafanous, D. Dudley Oldham, Pepper, Hamilton Scheetz, Alfred W. Cortese, Jr., Kathleen

  8. Glenfed Dev. Corp. v. Superior Court

    53 Cal.App.4th 1113 (Cal. Ct. App. 1997)   Cited 19 times

    Docket No. B108546. March 27, 1997. Appeal from Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. BC131389, Frances Rothschild, Judge. COUNSEL Cox, Castle Nicholson, Jeffrey D. Masters and Mark Moore for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent. Horvitz Levy, Peter Abrahams, Andrea M. Gauthier, Murtaugh, Miller, Meyer Nelson, Bradford H. Miller and Gregory M. Heuser for Real Party in Interest. OPINION VOGEL (Miriam A.), J. — BACKGROUND Several lawsuits alleging construction defects were filed against Glenfed

  9. St. Paul Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. Superior Court

    156 Cal.App.3d 82 (Cal. Ct. App. 1984)   Cited 11 times

    Docket Nos. A027061, A027062. May 21, 1984. COUNSEL Kornblum, Kelly Herlihy, Guy O. Kornblum, Abigail S. Kelly, Donna P. Clay, Pamela Levin, Jerome F. Downs and Thornton, Taylor Downs for Petitioners. No appearance for Respondent. Lee S. Harris and Cartwright, Sucherman, Slobodin Fowler for Real Parties in Interest. OPINION BARRY-DEAL, J. These two petitions, decided together for convenience, arise out of the same superior court action, a suit by homeowners against two insurance companies for failure