Toyota Motor Mfg., Ky., Inc. v. Williams

Holding "substantially" and "major" "need to be interpreted strictly to create a demanding standard for qualifying as disabled," and therefore, to be disabled "an individual must have an impairment that prevents or severely restricts the individual from doing activities that are of central importance to most people’s daily lives"

Granite Rock Co. v. Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters

Holding that the court decides when union ratified, and thus became a party to, collective bargaining agreement containing arbitration clause

Paperworkers v. Misco, Inc.

Holding jurisdiction to enforce a collective bargaining agreement only vests once grievance and arbitration procedures are exhausted

Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts

Holding that “the Due Process Clause of course requires that the named plaintiff at all times adequately represent the interests of the absent class members”

Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Massachusetts

Holding that the National Labor Relations Act does not permit “unions and employers to bargain for terms of employment that state law forbids employers to establish unilaterally”

People v. Jennings

Finding trial court not required to give sua sponte instruction on "complete defense" of accident that would negate the intent element necessary for first degree murder convictions where defense hinged on facts particular to the case and the defendant failed to request the instruction

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Hague

Holding that a Minnesota court may apply Minnesota rule permitting “stacking” of motorcycle insurance policies because plaintiff now lived in Minnesota and her deceased spouse had worked in Minnesota, even though plaintiff had lived in Wisconsin at the time of the accident, and even though decedent had lived in Wisconsin, had taken out the insurance policies in Wisconsin, and had been killed in Wisconsin

Nedlloyd Lines B.V. v. Superior Court

Holding that the phrase "governed by" in a choice of law clause compels the "logical conclusion" that the parties "intended that law to apply to all disputes arising out of the transaction or relationship"

Comedy Club, Inc. v. Improv West Associates

Holding that manifest disregard survives as “shorthand for ... 9 U.S.C. § 10, which states that the court may vacate ‘where the arbitrators exceeded their powers' ”

Collins v. Horton

Finding there to be no manifest error where there was no binding precedent on point

Section 10 - Same; vacation; grounds; rehearing

Vacating arbitration award appropriate " where the award was procured by corruption, fraud, or undue means; where there was evident partiality or corruption in the arbitrators, or either of them; where the arbitrators were guilty of misconduct in refusing to postpone the hearing, upon sufficient cause shown, or in refusing to hear evidence pertinent and material to the controversy; or of any other misbehavior by which the rights of any party have been prejudiced; or where the arbitrators exceeded their powers, or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final, and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made."

Section 2804 - Contract waiving benefits of article null and void

Providing that any agreement made by an employee to waive his or her right to expense reimbursement is and void

Section 5000 - Generally

Section 40.1-62 - Employer not to require payment of union dues, etc

Prohibiting employers from conditioning employment upon employee's payment of dues, fees, or other charges to a labor organization

Section 7311 - Additional applicability