51 Cited authorities

District of Columbia et al. v. Heller
554 U.S. 570 (2008) Cited 4,022 times 51 Legal Analyses
Holding it irrelevant to the constitutionality of D.C.'s "handgun" ban that the law allowed citizens the possession of substitutes, like "long guns"
Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation
497 U.S. 871 (1990) Cited 9,758 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to admit affidavits in support of standing when filed after summary judgment briefing and hearing were complete
Summers v. Earth Island Inst.
555 U.S. 488 (2009) Cited 3,160 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding that supplementation of the district court record to receive affidavits from the organization's members was not permitted "in the circumstances here: after the trial is over, judgment has been entered, and a notice of appeal has been filed"
McDonald v. City of Chicago
561 U.S. 742 (2010) Cited 2,635 times 22 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Second Amendment applies to the states, through incorporation under the Fourteenth Amendment
Engquist v. Oregon Dep't of Agric.
553 U.S. 591 (2008) Cited 2,631 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that a class-of-one equal-protection claim cannot be raised in the public-employment context based in part upon the discretionary nature of the employment decisions
Buckley v. Valeo
424 U.S. 1 (1976) Cited 3,466 times 41 Legal Analyses
Holding that a public financing law does not "abridge, restrict, or censor" expression
Perry Ed. Assn. v. Perry Local Educators' Assn
460 U.S. 37 (1983) Cited 2,292 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that content-neutral time, place, and manner restrictions on speech must be "narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest, and leave open ample alternative channels of communication"
Soldal v. Cook County
506 U.S. 56 (1992) Cited 1,382 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that Fourth Amendment protects possessory interest even absent liberty or privacy interests
Califano v. Yamasaki
442 U.S. 682 (1979) Cited 2,043 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding that claimants could bring social security class action "at least so long as the membership of the class is limited to those who meet the requirements of § 205(g)"
Cornelius v. Naacp Legal Defense Ed. Fund
473 U.S. 788 (1985) Cited 1,599 times
Holding that a charitable fundraising drive conducted in a federal workplace was a nonpublic forum
Section 922 - Unlawful acts
18 U.S.C. § 922 Cited 63,184 times 187 Legal Analyses
Finding that "even before the sale of a firearm, the gun, its component parts, ammunition, and the raw materials from which they are made have considerably moved in interstate commerce"
Section 706 - Scope of review
5 U.S.C. § 706 Cited 20,991 times 230 Legal Analyses
Granting courts jurisdiction to "compel agency action unlawfully held or unreasonably delayed"
Rule 25 - Substitution of Parties
Fed. R. Civ. P. 25 Cited 11,208 times 11 Legal Analyses
Providing for the automatic substitution at the district-court level of public officers sued in their official capacities
Section 701 - Application; definitions
5 U.S.C. § 701 Cited 9,567 times 39 Legal Analyses
Adopting the definition given in Section 551
Section 704 - Actions reviewable
5 U.S.C. § 704 Cited 4,373 times 33 Legal Analyses
Granting judicial review over " final agency action"
Section 703 - Form and venue of proceeding
5 U.S.C. § 703 Cited 524 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding venue of and jurisdiction over action seeking review of agency action will first depend upon relevant statute providing for review, if any
Section 930 - Possession of firearms and dangerous weapons in Federal facilities
18 U.S.C. § 930 Cited 123 times 1 Legal Analyses
Explaining that for purposes of § 930, a dangerous weapon "means a weapon, device, [or] instrument . . . that is used for, or is readily capable of, causing death or serious bodily injury, except that such term does not include a pocket knife with a blade of less than 2 ½ inches in length"

Morris et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al

51 Cited authorities

Holding it irrelevant to the constitutionality of D.C.'s "handgun" ban that the law allowed citizens the possession of substitutes, like "long guns"

Holding the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to admit affidavits in support of standing when filed after summary judgment briefing and hearing were complete

Holding that supplementation of the district court record to receive affidavits from the organization's members was not permitted "in the circumstances here: after the trial is over, judgment has been entered, and a notice of appeal has been filed"

Holding that the Second Amendment applies to the states, through incorporation under the Fourteenth Amendment

Holding that a class-of-one equal-protection claim cannot be raised in the public-employment context based in part upon the discretionary nature of the employment decisions

Holding that a public financing law does not "abridge, restrict, or censor" expression

Holding that content-neutral time, place, and manner restrictions on speech must be "narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest, and leave open ample alternative channels of communication"

Holding that Fourth Amendment protects possessory interest even absent liberty or privacy interests

Holding that claimants could bring social security class action "at least so long as the membership of the class is limited to those who meet the requirements of § 205(g)"

Holding that a charitable fundraising drive conducted in a federal workplace was a nonpublic forum

Finding that "even before the sale of a firearm, the gun, its component parts, ammunition, and the raw materials from which they are made have considerably moved in interstate commerce"

Granting courts jurisdiction to "compel agency action unlawfully held or unreasonably delayed"

Providing for the automatic substitution at the district-court level of public officers sued in their official capacities

Adopting the definition given in Section 551

Granting judicial review over " final agency action"

Holding venue of and jurisdiction over action seeking review of agency action will first depend upon relevant statute providing for review, if any

Explaining that for purposes of § 930, a dangerous weapon "means a weapon, device, [or] instrument . . . that is used for, or is readily capable of, causing death or serious bodily injury, except that such term does not include a pocket knife with a blade of less than 2 ½ inches in length"