6 Cited authorities

  1. Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.

    494 U.S. 472 (1990)   Cited 3,290 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding mootness destroys subject-matter jurisdiction
  2. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Haworth

    300 U.S. 227 (1937)   Cited 3,443 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a request for a declaratory judgment regarding an insured's disability was justiciable
  3. Apotex, Inc. v. Food Drug Admin

    449 F.3d 1249 (D.C. Cir. 2006)   Cited 40 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Determining that there is no need to address the other preliminary injunction factors if the plaintiff "has little likelihood of succeeding on the merits of its claim"
  4. Conoco, Inc. v. Skinner

    781 F. Supp. 298 (D. Del. 1991)   Cited 2 times

    Civ. A. No. 91-122-JLL. December 16, 1991. Richard Allen Paul of E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co., Wilmington, Del., and Mark P. Schlefer, T.S.L. Perlman, Leonard Egan, and William C. Buckhold of Fort Schlefer, Washington, D.C., of counsel, for plaintiffs. William C. Carpenter, Jr., U.S. Atty. and Kent A. Jordan, Asst. U.S. Atty., Wilmington, Del., Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., Sandra M. Schraibman, Asst. Director, and Susan Friedman Cohen, Civil Div. Trial Atty., for the U

  5. Allied Poultry Processors Company v. Polin

    134 F. Supp. 278 (D. Del. 1955)   Cited 5 times

    Civ. A. 1693. June 14, 1955. James M. Tunnell, Jr. (of Tunnell Tunnell), Georgetown, Del., for plaintiff. William Prickett, Wilmington, Del., for defendants. RODNEY, District Judge. This matter involves priority of discovery process under various Rules of Civil Procedure, but presents, for prior disposition, the issue of jurisdiction when such jurisdiction is duly alleged in the complaint and specifically denied in the answer. The complaint filed March 31, 1955 alleges a jurisdictional amount and

  6. Section 355 - New drugs

    21 U.S.C. § 355   Cited 2,241 times   334 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to change the date on which an ANDA may be approved if "either party to the action failed to reasonably cooperate in expediting the action"