12 Cited authorities

  1. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 263,703 times   364 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
  2. Verizon Comm. v. Law Offices of Trinko

    540 U.S. 398 (2004)   Cited 505 times   54 Legal Analyses
    Holding even a monopolist has no duty to cooperate with rivals
  3. In re Silicon Graphics Inc.

    183 F.3d 970 (9th Cir. 1999)   Cited 1,402 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that stock sales of individual defendants are only indicative of scienter where they are "dramatically out of line with prior trading practices" (quoting In re Apple Computer Sec. Litig., 886 F.2d 1109, 1117 (9th Cir. 1989))
  4. Falk v. General Motors Corp.

    496 F. Supp. 2d 1088 (N.D. Cal. 2007)   Cited 314 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs stated an unfair practices claim where defendant, a car manufacturer, "failed to meet its duty to disclose any known and material defects"
  5. Brulotte v. Thys Co.

    379 U.S. 29 (1964)   Cited 194 times   51 Legal Analyses
    Holding that charging royalties beyond life of the patent impermissibly enlarges monopoly of the patent
  6. United States v. Generix Drug Corp.

    460 U.S. 453 (1983)   Cited 73 times
    Concluding that the term drug “is plainly intended throughout the Act to include entire drug products, complete with active and inactive ingredients” and must “include more than just active ingredients ... unless subsection (D) is to be superfluous”
  7. Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc.

    948 F.2d 536 (9th Cir. 1991)   Cited 139 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting the doctrine
  8. Atari Games Corp. v. Nintendo of America

    897 F.2d 1572 (Fed. Cir. 1990)   Cited 83 times
    Vacating preliminary injunction against filing infringement suits
  9. SCM Corp. v. Xerox Corp.

    645 F.2d 1195 (2d Cir. 1981)   Cited 80 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "where a patent has been lawfully acquired, subsequent conduct permissible under the patent laws cannot trigger any liability under the antitrust laws"
  10. Monsanto Co. v. McFarling

    302 F.3d 1291 (Fed. Cir. 2002)   Cited 35 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a consent to jurisdiction clause is enforceable "unless the party challenging it clearly demonstrates that it is invalid or that enforcement would be unreasonable or unjust"
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 342,515 times   917 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss