§Why CasetextPricing

Madison 92nd Street Associates, LLC v. Marriott International, Inc. et al

REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support of Motion to Strike Defendants' Reply Memoranda, etc. Document

11 Cited authorities

  1. Spool v. World Child

    520 F.3d 178 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding "a serious, but discrete and relatively short-lived scheme . . . insufficient to establish open-ended continuity"

  2. Correspondent Services Corp. v. JVW Investment, Ltd.

    No. 99 Civ. 8934 (RWS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 29, 2004)   Cited 21 times
    In Correspondent Services, the District Court awarded attorney's fees because the sanctioned party knew that subject matter jurisdiction was lacking, yet invoked the court's power to attach property anyway.

  3. In re Old Carco Llc (f/K/A Chrysler Llc)

    454 B.R. 38 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2011)   Cited 9 times
    Granting motion to dismiss where “the contemporaneous market information concerning the involvement of other sophisticated parties in the transaction” rendered constructive fraudulent conveyance implausible

  4. Briese Lichttechnik Vertriebs GmbH v. Langton

    No. 09 Civ. 9790 (LTS)(MHD) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 8, 2012)   Cited 3 times
    Finding that a witness with over fifteen years of experience working with lighting equipment could testify as a lay person regarding the structure and operation of particular types of lighting equipment

  5. Bruce v. Woodford

    CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00269-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2012)   Cited 2 times

    CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00269-BAM PC 04-24-2012 VINCENT C. BRUCE, Plaintiff, v. JEANNE WOODFORD, et al., Defendants. Barbara A. McAuliffe ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (ECF No. 77) ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF Nos. 37, 53, 59) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS AND MOTION FOR TEN DAY EXTENSION OF TIME AND STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENT TO WRITTEN OBJECTIONS (ECF Nos. 60, 69, 113) ORDER STRIKING FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF No. 92) THIRTY

  6. Travelers Ins. Co. v. Buffalo Reinsurance

    735 F. Supp. 492 (S.D.N.Y. 1990)   Cited 19 times
    In Travelers, there was evidence placed before the Court that it is not unusual for a substantial time to pass from notification of the intermediary by the ceding insurer of impending activity and the intermediary's subsequent notification of the reinsurers.

  7. U.S. v. Witmer

    835 F. Supp. 208 (M.D. Pa. 1993)   Cited 13 times
    Finding no disabling conflict of interest arising from the involvement of an attorney from the Army, whose "loyalty to his own financial interests and those of other private parties is not brought into play"

  8. PONY PAL, LLC v. CLAIRE'S BOUTIQUES, INC.

    05 Civ. 2355 (CSH) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 2, 2006)

    05 Civ. 2355 (CSH). October 2, 2006 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CHARLES HAIGHT, District Judge In this diversity action, Plaintiff Pony Pal, LLC ("Pony Pal") sues Defendant Claire's Boutiques, Inc. ("Claire's") for breach of contract for failing to make royalty payments pursuant to a licensing agreement authorizing Defendant to manufacture and sell products covered by Plaintiff's patent. Defendant has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.Proc. Plaintiff resists that motion and

  9. U.S. v. Witmer

    835 F. Supp. 201 (M.D. Pa. 1993)   Cited 4 times

    Misc. No. 93-071. September 9, 1993. Michael F. Hertz, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Div., Commercial Litigation Branch, Washington, DC, Michael J. Kane, Asst. U.S. Atty., Harrisburg, PA, Stephen D. Altman, U.S. Dept. of Justice Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Div., Dennis L. Phillips, Steven A. Maddox, Frank W. Hunger, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Div., Washington, DC, for U.S. Laurence W. Dague, Raja G. Rajan, Shumaker Williams, P.C., Harrisburg, PA, for John D. Witmer. Marybeth Sullivan, Washington

  10. Zentner v. Am. Fed'n. of Musicians of U.S. Can.

    237 F. Supp. 457 (S.D.N.Y. 1965)   Cited 8 times

    January 6, 1965. Godfrey P. Schmidt, New York City, for plaintiff. McGoldrick, Dannett, Horowitz Golub, New York City, for defendant, American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada. Emanuel Dannett, New York City, of counsel. Henry Kaiser, Washington, D.C., General Counsel to Defendant, American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada. WEINFELD, District Judge. Plaintiff, an orchestra leader-employer, seeks a preliminary injunction to enjoin the defendant American

  11. Rule 15 - Amended and Supplemental Pleadings

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 15   Cited 90,158 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding that, per N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1024, New York law provides a more forgiving principle for relation back in the context of naming John Doe defendants described with particularity in the complaint