21 Cited authorities

  1. Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz

    471 U.S. 462 (1985)   Cited 14,440 times   37 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a defendant has "fair warning" if he purposefully directs his activities at residents of the forum and if the litigation results from alleged injuries arising out of or relating to those activities.
  2. Helicopteros Nacionales de Colom. v. Hall

    466 U.S. 408 (1984)   Cited 8,260 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “purchases, even if occurring at regular intervals” were insufficient to establish general personal jurisdiction over a nonresident corporation
  3. Asahi Metal Indus. Co. Ltd. v. Superior Court, 480 U.S. 102

    480 U.S. 102 (1987)   Cited 4,380 times   36 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in suit by Taiwanese manufacturer for indemnification against Japanese manufacturer, the assertion by California court of personal jurisdiction over Japanese manufacturer was unreasonable
  4. Metropolitan Life Ins. v. Robertson-Ceco Corp.

    84 F.3d 560 (2d Cir. 1996)   Cited 1,182 times
    Holding that dismissal was appropriate where no witnesses or other evidence were located in Vermont, neither party was a resident, and "Florida, the locus of the alleged tort . . . ha far more significant interest[] in resolving the dispute"
  5. Toys “R” Us, Inc. v. Step Two, S.A.

    318 F.3d 446 (3d Cir. 2003)   Cited 787 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that evidence of the defendant's intentional targeting of its website to the forum state was required to satisfy the "purposeful availment" prong of the minimum contacts analysis
  6. Chloé v. Queen Bee of Beverly Hills, LLC

    616 F.3d 158 (2d Cir. 2010)   Cited 449 times
    Holding that exercise of personal jurisdiction is reasonable where, inter alia, forum state has an interest "in providing effective means of redress for its residents"
  7. Sunward Elecs., Inc. v. McDonald

    362 F.3d 17 (2d Cir. 2004)   Cited 358 times
    Holding that Defendants transacted business in New York where they "maintained a continuous and on-going commercial relationship with Plaintiff, a New York business," and "traveled to New York on two occasions to attend . . . training programs"
  8. Illinois v. Hemi Group LLC

    622 F.3d 754 (7th Cir. 2010)   Cited 151 times
    Holding that "[t]here is nothing constitutionally unfair about allowing Illinois" to exercise personal jurisdiction where the defendant had "held itself out to conduct business nationwide and was apparently successful in reaching customers across the country"
  9. Revision Military, Inc. v. Balboa Mfg. Co.

    700 F.3d 524 (Fed. Cir. 2012)   Cited 35 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that Federal Circuit law governs a preliminary injunction motion targeting patent infringement
  10. Country Home Prods., Inc. v. Schiller-Pfeiffer

    350 F. Supp. 2d 561 (D. Vt. 2004)   Cited 23 times
    Explaining that "the plaintiff is not required to establish that his chosen venue has the most substantial contacts to the dispute; rather, it is sufficient that a substantial part of the events occurred [here], even if a greater part of the events occurred elsewhere"
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 267,561 times   779 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss