13 Cited authorities

Schaffer v. Weast
546 U.S. 49 (2005) Cited 998 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that this is the default rule
Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Potawatomi Tribe
498 U.S. 505 (1991) Cited 626 times 10 Legal Analyses
Holding that states have a right to collect taxes on certain cigarette sales on an Indian reservation, but the tribe is immune from suit seeking to enforce that right
Solem v. Bartlett
465 U.S. 463 (1984) Cited 234 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that because the defendant, who was an enrolled member of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, committed a crime on reservation grounds, the state did not have criminal jurisdiction over him
DeCoteau v. District County Court
420 U.S. 425 (1975) Cited 285 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the reservation was terminated where there was express language regarding termination, a sum-certain payment, and tribal consent to the agreement
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray Reservation v. Utah
114 F.3d 1513 (10th Cir. 1997) Cited 94 times
Recognizing "importance of finality" in deciding whether to modify decision
United States v. McGowan
302 U.S. 535 (1938) Cited 122 times
Holding that non-reservation trust land was Indian country; it was validly set apart for the use of Indians under federal superintendence
Ford Motor Co. v. Transport Indem. Co.
795 F.2d 538 (6th Cir. 1986) Cited 81 times
Holding that if a “district court's ruling on one claim necessarily precludes an alternative or mutually exclusive claim, a final order will arise despite the lack of an explicit declaration by the district court”
Riemer v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.
274 F.R.D. 637 (N.D. Ill. 2011) Cited 31 times
Striking "affirmative defenses [that were] . . . inadequately pled under pre-Twombly case law since . . . they do not give fair notice of what is being alleged . . . . are nothing more than statements that do not provide fair notice to the plaintiff."
United States v. Winans
198 U.S. 371 (1905) Cited 242 times
Holding that state license did not give Washington settler the right to exclude the Indian seeking to enjoy his “in common” fishing right
Yankton Sioux Tribe v. Gaffey
188 F.3d 1010 (8th Cir. 1999) Cited 40 times
Holding that the Yankton Sioux Reservation "has been further diminished by the loss of those land originally allotted to tribal members which have passed out of Indian hands."

Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians v. Snyder

13 Cited authorities

Holding that this is the default rule

Holding that states have a right to collect taxes on certain cigarette sales on an Indian reservation, but the tribe is immune from suit seeking to enforce that right

Holding that because the defendant, who was an enrolled member of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, committed a crime on reservation grounds, the state did not have criminal jurisdiction over him

Holding that the reservation was terminated where there was express language regarding termination, a sum-certain payment, and tribal consent to the agreement

Recognizing "importance of finality" in deciding whether to modify decision

Holding that non-reservation trust land was Indian country; it was validly set apart for the use of Indians under federal superintendence

Holding that if a “district court's ruling on one claim necessarily precludes an alternative or mutually exclusive claim, a final order will arise despite the lack of an explicit declaration by the district court”

Striking "affirmative defenses [that were] . . . inadequately pled under pre-Twombly case law since . . . they do not give fair notice of what is being alleged . . . . are nothing more than statements that do not provide fair notice to the plaintiff."

Holding that state license did not give Washington settler the right to exclude the Indian seeking to enjoy his “in common” fishing right

Holding that the Yankton Sioux Reservation "has been further diminished by the loss of those land originally allotted to tribal members which have passed out of Indian hands."