36 Cited authorities

  1. Elrod v. Burns

    427 U.S. 347 (1976)   Cited 3,817 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding public employees could not be fired because of their politics unless they held "policymaking" or "confidential" positions
  2. McCarthy v. Madigan

    503 U.S. 140 (1992)   Cited 1,645 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a prisoner was not required to exhaust the Bureau of Prisons' administrative procedure before making a Bivens claim for money damages
  3. University of Texas v. Camenisch

    451 U.S. 390 (1981)   Cited 2,573 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the question whether a preliminary injunction should have been issued . . . is moot . . . [where] the terms of the injunction . . . have been fully and irrevocably carried out."
  4. Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security

    336 F.3d 469 (6th Cir. 2003)   Cited 3,682 times
    Holding that an ALJ appropriately disregarded a physician's conclusion when there was no "objective medical evidence" supporting the physician's medical assessment
  5. Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company

    561 U.S. 477 (2010)   Cited 349 times   65 Legal Analyses
    Holding unconstitutional tenure provisions protecting executive officer, but concluding "the existence of the Board does not violate the separation of powers"
  6. Judulang v. Holder

    565 U.S. 42 (2011)   Cited 307 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an irrational application of a statute is arbitrary and capricious
  7. Darby v. Cisneros

    509 U.S. 137 (1993)   Cited 500 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the APA’s judicial review statute "explicitly requires exhaustion of all intra-agency appeals mandated either by statute or by agency rule," but does not "require litigants to exhaust optional appeals as well"
  8. Overstreet v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County

    305 F.3d 566 (6th Cir. 2002)   Cited 961 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that this Court "will not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal unless our failure to consider the issue will result in a plain miscarriage of justice"
  9. Certified Restoration Dry Cleaning v. Tenke

    511 F.3d 535 (6th Cir. 2007)   Cited 594 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding a non-competition provision that lasted two years on the ground that it is "a period which Michigan courts have consistently upheld as reasonable . . . ."
  10. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

    925 F.2d 979 (6th Cir. 1991)   Cited 589 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "Plaintiff makes much of the fact that in the narrative portion of his report, Dr. Murthi stated that he recommended a return to work on a trial basis. . . . Even though Dr. Murthi recommended work only on a trial basis, we do not believe Metropolitan's action in terminating benefits was inconsistent with the scheme as set forth in the Plan."
  11. Rule 65 - Injunctions and Restraining Orders

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 65   Cited 17,157 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing court's ability to enter emergency order with less than full adversary hearing and even, in appropriate circumstances, without notice
  12. Section 701 - Application; definitions

    5 U.S.C. § 701   Cited 8,639 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the definition given in Section 551
  13. Section 1997 - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 1997   Cited 2,153 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Requiring exhaustion of "such administrative remedies as are available"
  14. Section 1099b - Recognition of accrediting agency or association

    20 U.S.C. § 1099b   Cited 49 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Requiring the accreditor to assess the institution's curricula, faculty, physical facilities, fiscal stability, student services, program length, degrees offered, and history of student complaints
  15. Section 602.25 - Due process

    34 C.F.R. § 602.25   Cited 12 times
    Requiring same
  16. Section 602.26 - Notification of accrediting decisions

    34 C.F.R. § 602.26   Cited 3 times

    The agency must demonstrate that it has established and follows written procedures requiring it to provide written notice of its accrediting decisions to the Secretary, the appropriate State licensing or authorizing agency, the appropriate accrediting agencies, and the public. The agency meets this requirement if the agency, following its written procedures- (a) Provides written notice of the following types of decisions to the Secretary, the appropriate State licensing or authorizing agency, the