34 Cited authorities

  1. Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona

    520 U.S. 43 (1997)   Cited 2,651 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the plaintiff's challenge to a state law affecting the performance of her job duties was mooted when she left state employment
  2. Hollingsworth v. Perry

    570 U.S. 693 (2013)   Cited 1,040 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that proponents of a ballot initiative who "ha[d] no role ... in the enforcement of " the initiative and were not "agents of the State" lacked standing to defend it on appeal
  3. Diamond v. Charles

    476 U.S. 54 (1986)   Cited 1,221 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that assessment of attorney's fees against a party does not confer standing to pursue the action on appeal
  4. Firefighters v. Cleveland

    478 U.S. 501 (1986)   Cited 721 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party may not impose duties or obligations on a third party without that party's agreement
  5. Donaldson v. United States

    400 U.S. 517 (1971)   Cited 874 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "Rule 81 [specifically recognizes] that a district court, by local rule or by order, may limit the application of the [Federal Rules of Civil Procedure] in a summons proceeding."
  6. D'Amato v. Deutsche Bank

    236 F.3d 78 (2d Cir. 2001)   Cited 430 times
    Holding that the district court properly concluded that 18 objections from a class of 27,883 weighed in favor of settlement
  7. Donnelly v. Glickman

    159 F.3d 405 (9th Cir. 1998)   Cited 382 times
    Holding that an applicant may lack an interest in the liability phase of an action, but may still be entitled to intervene in the remedies phase
  8. Edwards v. City of Houston

    78 F.3d 983 (5th Cir. 1996)   Cited 370 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that interest of police officers in having equal access to a promotion system was sufficient to justify intervention as of right by officers' associations and unions to contest entry of a consent decree in an employment discrimination case against the City of Houston requiring a series of remedial promotions for members of certain minority groups
  9. United States v. City of Los Angeles

    288 F.3d 391 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 270 times
    Holding that "mere[] differences in [litigation] strategy" are insufficient grounds to "justify intervention as a matter of right"
  10. United States v. City of N.Y.

    717 F.3d 72 (2d Cir. 2013)   Cited 148 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Vacating summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds where trier of fact could reasonably find discriminatory intent on part of defendant government official
  11. Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 1   Cited 16,176 times   52 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the federal rules of civil procedure should be employed to promote the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding"
  12. Rule 24 - Intervention

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 24   Cited 9,520 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Granting the right of intervention to qualifying persons "unless existing parties adequately represent" them