26 Cited authorities

  1. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife

    504 U.S. 555 (1992)   Cited 21,997 times   122 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a sufficient specification of when the injury in fact will occur is necessary
  2. Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA

    568 U.S. 398 (2013)   Cited 1,833 times   151 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain attorneys and organizations did not have standing to challenge the constitutionality of a provision of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978
  3. Warth v. Seldin

    422 U.S. 490 (1975)   Cited 10,206 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Article III requires plaintiffs "to establish that, in fact, the asserted injury was the consequence of the defendants’ actions"
  4. McDonald v. City of Chicago

    561 U.S. 742 (2010)   Cited 1,332 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “the Second Amendment right is fully applicable to the States”
  5. Hollingsworth v. Perry

    570 U.S. 693 (2013)   Cited 650 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "any person invoking the power of a federal court must demonstrate standing to do so," id. at 2661, and that a prerequisite to "intervene to defend" one's interest is, inter alia , "assert[ing] an injury in fact of [one's] own," id. at 2664
  6. Bliven v. Hunt

    579 F.3d 204 (2d Cir. 2009)   Cited 458 times
    Holding "allegations of bad faith or malice cannot overcome judicial immunity"
  7. Kachalsky v. Cnty. of Westchester

    701 F.3d 81 (2d Cir. 2012)   Cited 153 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that although "some form of heightened scrutiny would be appropriate," strict scrutiny was not necessary, and instead applying intermediate scrutiny
  8. N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. Cuomo

    804 F.3d 242 (2d Cir. 2015)   Cited 101 times
    Holding that a ban on LCMs "survive intermediate scrutiny"
  9. Ognibene v. Parkes

    671 F.3d 174 (2d Cir. 2012)   Cited 59 times
    Upholding contribution ban with New York City contractors
  10. Bach v. Pataki

    408 F.3d 75 (2d Cir. 2005)   Cited 66 times
    Holding that a New York regulation restricting applications for handgun licenses to nonresidents with a primary place of business in the State did not violate the Privileges and Immunities Clause because the "discrimination [was] sufficiently justified by New York's public safety interest in monitoring handgun licensees" and its inability to access sufficient information about the qualifications of nonresidents
  11. Section 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

    42 U.S.C. § 1983   Cited 401,501 times   583 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any state actor who "subjects, or causes [a person] to be subjected" to a constitutional violation
  12. Rule 25 - Substitution of Parties

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 25   Cited 7,613 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Referring to the death of "a party" whose "claim is not extinguished"