Heard Aug. 26, 1963. Proceeding on objections to interrogatories which had been posed to defendant motorist by the plaintiff. The District Court, Craven, Chief Judge, held that interrogatory posed to the motorist inquiring as to what had ‘ prompted’ him to drive the front of his vehicle into the rear of another on date in question was not objectionable as repetitious, irrelevant, vague, argumentative, or too general or all inclusive in nature. Order accordingly. Beverly H. Currin, Charlotte, N. C