13 Cited authorities

Scott v. Harris
550 U.S. 372 (2007) Cited 10,971 times 11 Legal Analyses
Holding when there is video capturing the events in question, a court may rely on the video evidence rather than crediting the non-moving party's version of the facts if those facts are contradicted by video evidence
McDonald v. City of Chicago
561 U.S. 742 (2010) Cited 1,974 times 21 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Second Amendment applies to the states, through incorporation under the Fourteenth Amendment
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey
505 U.S. 833 (1992) Cited 1,846 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that a spousal notification provision was unconstitutional
Major League Baseball v. Salvino
542 F.3d 290 (2d Cir. 2008) Cited 888 times
Holding adequate foundation for business records exception laid in similar affidavit
Ezell v. City of Chicago
651 F.3d 684 (7th Cir. 2011) Cited 508 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that the right to possess firearms "implies a corresponding right to acquire and maintain proficiency in their use"
U.S. v. Marzzarella
614 F.3d 85 (3d Cir. 2010) Cited 366 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a federal law banning possession of a firearm with an altered serial number “would pass muster under either intermediate scrutiny or strict scrutiny”
Murdock v. Pennsylvania
319 U.S. 105 (1943) Cited 852 times
Holding that the hand distribution of religious materials are protected speech
U.S. v. Skoien
614 F.3d 638 (7th Cir. 2010) Cited 325 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding constitutional 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), which forbids those convicted of crimes of domestic violence to possess a gun
U.S. v. Chester
628 F.3d 673 (4th Cir. 2010) Cited 291 times
Holding that the government had not borne its burden under intermediate scrutiny because “[t]he government has offered numerous plausible reasons why the disarmament of domestic violence misdemeanants is substantially related to an important government goal; however, it has not attempted to offer sufficient evidence to establish a substantial relationship between [18 U.S.C] § 922(g) and an important governmental goal”
U.S. v. Reese
627 F.3d 792 (10th Cir. 2010) Cited 166 times
Holding that § 922(g) burdened the defendant's Second Amendment right at Step One but nonetheless that the law survived the heightened scrutiny analysis of Step Two
Rule 56 - Summary Judgment
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 Cited 322,424 times 154 Legal Analyses
Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

Kwong et al v. Bloomberg et al

13 Cited authorities

Holding when there is video capturing the events in question, a court may rely on the video evidence rather than crediting the non-moving party's version of the facts if those facts are contradicted by video evidence

Holding that the Second Amendment applies to the states, through incorporation under the Fourteenth Amendment

Holding that a spousal notification provision was unconstitutional

Holding adequate foundation for business records exception laid in similar affidavit

Holding that the right to possess firearms "implies a corresponding right to acquire and maintain proficiency in their use"

Holding that a federal law banning possession of a firearm with an altered serial number “would pass muster under either intermediate scrutiny or strict scrutiny”

Holding that the hand distribution of religious materials are protected speech

Holding constitutional 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), which forbids those convicted of crimes of domestic violence to possess a gun

Holding that § 922(g) burdened the defendant's Second Amendment right at Step One but nonetheless that the law survived the heightened scrutiny analysis of Step Two

Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit