13 Cited authorities

  1. Scott v. Harris

    550 U.S. 372 (2007)   Cited 10,971 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding when there is video capturing the events in question, a court may rely on the video evidence rather than crediting the non-moving party's version of the facts if those facts are contradicted by video evidence
  2. McDonald v. City of Chicago

    561 U.S. 742 (2010)   Cited 1,974 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Second Amendment applies to the states, through incorporation under the Fourteenth Amendment
  3. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey

    505 U.S. 833 (1992)   Cited 1,846 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a spousal notification provision was unconstitutional
  4. Major League Baseball v. Salvino

    542 F.3d 290 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 888 times
    Holding adequate foundation for business records exception laid in similar affidavit
  5. Ezell v. City of Chicago

    651 F.3d 684 (7th Cir. 2011)   Cited 508 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the right to possess firearms "implies a corresponding right to acquire and maintain proficiency in their use"
  6. U.S. v. Marzzarella

    614 F.3d 85 (3d Cir. 2010)   Cited 366 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a federal law banning possession of a firearm with an altered serial number “would pass muster under either intermediate scrutiny or strict scrutiny”
  7. Murdock v. Pennsylvania

    319 U.S. 105 (1943)   Cited 852 times
    Holding that the hand distribution of religious materials are protected speech
  8. U.S. v. Skoien

    614 F.3d 638 (7th Cir. 2010)   Cited 325 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding constitutional 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), which forbids those convicted of crimes of domestic violence to possess a gun
  9. U.S. v. Chester

    628 F.3d 673 (4th Cir. 2010)   Cited 291 times
    Holding that the government had not borne its burden under intermediate scrutiny because “[t]he government has offered numerous plausible reasons why the disarmament of domestic violence misdemeanants is substantially related to an important government goal; however, it has not attempted to offer sufficient evidence to establish a substantial relationship between [18 U.S.C] § 922(g) and an important governmental goal”
  10. U.S. v. Reese

    627 F.3d 792 (10th Cir. 2010)   Cited 166 times
    Holding that § 922(g) burdened the defendant's Second Amendment right at Step One but nonetheless that the law survived the heightened scrutiny analysis of Step Two
  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 322,424 times   154 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit