§Why CasetextPricing

Kimberlin v. Patrick Frey

RESPONSE in Opposition re MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 16 MOTION to Dismiss, 7 MOTION, 5 MOTION to Dismiss, 11 MOTION to Dismiss, 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, 9 MOTION

3 Cited authorities

  1. Faretta v. California

    422 U.S. 806 (1975)   Cited 12,534 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a defendant's right to self-representation was denied when he made his requests "weeks before trial" without any indication that the defendant was required to reassert his request during the trial

  2. Birl v. Estelle

    660 F.2d 592 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 845 times
    Holding that a pro se "litigant acquiesces in and subjects himself to the established rules of practice and procedure."

  3. United States v. Pinkey

    548 F.2d 305 (10th Cir. 1977)   Cited 63 times
    Noting the court is not obligated to assist or guide the pro se litigant