17 Cited authorities

Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife
504 U.S. 555 (1992) Cited 27,738 times 138 Legal Analyses
Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"
Summers v. Earth Island Inst.
555 U.S. 488 (2009) Cited 2,993 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding that supplementation of the district court record to receive affidavits from the organization's members was not permitted "in the circumstances here: after the trial is over, judgment has been entered, and a notice of appeal has been filed"
Warth v. Seldin
422 U.S. 490 (1975) Cited 11,836 times 14 Legal Analyses
Holding that Article III requires plaintiffs "to establish that, in fact, the asserted injury was the consequence of the defendants' actions"
Baker v. G. C. Services Corp.
677 F.2d 775 (9th Cir. 1982) Cited 363 times
Holding that the defense does not apply to legal errors
Johnson v. Riddle
443 F.3d 723 (10th Cir. 2006) Cited 161 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding that the "no intent" inquiry is "inherently subjective and `primarily becomes a credibility question' as to whether the defendant intended to violate the FDCPA"
Soppet v. Enhanced Recovery Co.
679 F.3d 637 (7th Cir. 2012) Cited 122 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding that consent must come from the current subscriber, and that a prior customer's authority to consent lapses when a cell phone number is reassigned
Zinni v. ER Solutions, Inc.
692 F.3d 1162 (11th Cir. 2012) Cited 64 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that an issue becomes moot when it no longer presents a live controversy for which a court cannot afford meaningful relief
In re Stratford of Texas, Inc.
635 F.2d 365 (5th Cir. 1981) Cited 100 times
Stating that the confirmed arrangement "is tantamount to a judgment" and "should be construed basically as a contract"
Ramirez v. Apex Financial Management, LLC
567 F. Supp. 2d 1035 (N.D. Ill. 2008) Cited 27 times
Holding messages constituted communications even without referencing a debt, when they "conveyed pertinent information to Plaintiff, including the fact that there was a matter that he should attend to and instructions on how to do so"
Doshay v. Global Credit Collection Corp.
796 F. Supp. 2d 1301 (D. Colo. 2011) Cited 21 times
Holding that voicemail message in which "Defendant's employee neither identified himself as a debt collector nor articulated that the purpose of the voicemail message was to collect a debt" constituted a communication under the FDCPA
Section 1692k - Civil liability
15 U.S.C. § 1692k Cited 6,102 times 65 Legal Analyses
Holding debt collectors civilly liable for illicit debt collection practices
Section 1692d - Harassment or abuse
15 U.S.C. § 1692d Cited 1,895 times 22 Legal Analyses
Limiting debt collectors’ ability to use threats of violence, publicize lists of consumers allegedly refusing to pay debts, cause a telephone to ring repeatedly or continuously, or engage someone in telephone conversation repeatedly or continuously

Jordan v. ER Solutions, Inc.

17 Cited authorities

Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"

Holding that supplementation of the district court record to receive affidavits from the organization's members was not permitted "in the circumstances here: after the trial is over, judgment has been entered, and a notice of appeal has been filed"

Holding that Article III requires plaintiffs "to establish that, in fact, the asserted injury was the consequence of the defendants' actions"

Holding that the defense does not apply to legal errors

Finding that the "no intent" inquiry is "inherently subjective and `primarily becomes a credibility question' as to whether the defendant intended to violate the FDCPA"

Holding that consent must come from the current subscriber, and that a prior customer's authority to consent lapses when a cell phone number is reassigned

Holding that an issue becomes moot when it no longer presents a live controversy for which a court cannot afford meaningful relief

Stating that the confirmed arrangement "is tantamount to a judgment" and "should be construed basically as a contract"

Holding messages constituted communications even without referencing a debt, when they "conveyed pertinent information to Plaintiff, including the fact that there was a matter that he should attend to and instructions on how to do so"

Holding that voicemail message in which "Defendant's employee neither identified himself as a debt collector nor articulated that the purpose of the voicemail message was to collect a debt" constituted a communication under the FDCPA

Holding debt collectors civilly liable for illicit debt collection practices

Limiting debt collectors’ ability to use threats of violence, publicize lists of consumers allegedly refusing to pay debts, cause a telephone to ring repeatedly or continuously, or engage someone in telephone conversation repeatedly or continuously