11 Cited authorities

  1. General Electric Co. v. Joiner

    522 U.S. 136 (1997)   Cited 3,835 times   31 Legal Analyses
    Holding that under the abuse of discretion standard the appellate court will not reverse unless the ruling is manifestly erroneous
  2. Texaco, Inc. v. Anh Thi Phan

    137 S.W.3d 763 (Tex. App. 2004)   Cited 77 times
    Holding evidence of lost profits damages legally insufficient because "the Owners failed to meet their burden of proving net profits, from which expenses had been subtracted" to arrive at lost profits
  3. Children's Broadcasting Corp. v. Walt Disney

    245 F.3d 1008 (8th Cir. 2001)   Cited 52 times
    Holding district court's conclusion that it should have excluded testimony of damages expert was not an abuse of discretion, in part because expert's opinion was based on claims that did not survive summary judgment
  4. Coonis v. Rogers

    429 S.W.2d 709 (Mo. 1968)   Cited 122 times
    Holding that violation of court injunction by interfering with contract right with full knowledge of situation provides tort claim supporting recovery for damages
  5. Spin Doctor Golf, Inc. v. Paymentech, L.P.

    296 S.W.3d 354 (Tex. App. 2009)   Cited 26 times
    Concluding credit card service agreement obligating credit card processing company to pay golfing business $5,000,000 it received from business's credit card sales was "major transaction," in "contrast" to "the insurer in Tex. Ass'n of Sch. Bds. [who] may never have to pay any money under the agreement"
  6. Hale County A & M Transport, LLC v. City of Kansas City

    998 F. Supp. 2d 838 (W.D. Mo. 2014)   Cited 6 times
    Excluding expert testimony on whether expert found witness's story useful to analysis
  7. In re Celexa & Lexapro Prods. Liab. Litig.

    927 F. Supp. 2d 758 (E.D. Mo. 2013)   Cited 5 times

    No. MDL 1736. 2013-03-4 In re CELEXA AND LEXAPRO PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. Arnold Anderson Vickery, Perdue Kidd & Vickery, Paul F. Waldner, III, Vickery & Waldner LLP, Rand P. Nolen, Fleming and Associates, L.L.P., Houston, TX, Christopher L. Coffin, Pendley and Braudin, Plaquemine, LA, Tia J. Goodman, Burton & Goodman, Oklahoma City, OK, James C. Valenti, Gibson and Valenti, Lakeland, FL, Henry J. Mims, Mims Law Office, Greer, SC, Karen Barth Menzies, Baum Hedlund, APC, Karen J. Travis, Mark

  8. Board of Trustees v. Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby, Inc.

    191 S.W.3d 185 (Tex. App. 2006)   Cited 11 times
    Concluding that speculative opinion, "such as an opinion on what someone else was thinking at a specific time" is mere conjecture that will not assist jury
  9. Boehm v. Eli Lilly & Co.

    747 F.3d 501 (8th Cir. 2014)   Cited 3 times
    Affirming summary judgment where prescribing doctor was given scientifically unsupported hypothetical about alternative warning
  10. Kozak v. Medtronic, Inc.

    512 F. Supp. 2d 913 (S.D. Tex. 2007)   Cited 5 times
    Rejecting "post hoc rationalization" of expert opinion