§Why CasetextPricing

Jabbarov et al vs. Bush et al

RESPONSE to Petitioner's Dec. 14, 2006 Motion for Order Requiring Repondents to Provide Counsel for Petitioner Sharkawi Abda Ali Al-haag with a Factual Return

7 Cited authorities

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America

    511 U.S. 375 (1994)   Cited 18,896 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that absent a reservation of jurisdiction in the stipulated dismissal order, federal courts lack jurisdiction to consider enforcement of a settlement agreement

  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Env't

    523 U.S. 83 (1998)   Cited 10,693 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court "act ultra vires" when it assumes "hypothetical jurisdiction" in order to rule on the merits

  3. Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Reich

    510 U.S. 200 (1994)   Cited 405 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Holding that petitioner's constitutional claims could first be brought before the agency

  4. Telecommunications Research Action v. F.C.C

    750 F.2d 70 (D.C. Cir. 1984)   Cited 914 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a district court did not have jurisdiction to review a rule or issue a writ of mandamus because of a special review statute that assigned judicial review to the courts of appeals

  5. Laing v. Ashcroft

    370 F.3d 994 (9th Cir. 2004)   Cited 372 times
    Holding that failure to file a timely petition for review challenging aggravated nature of felony conviction bars habeas review

  6. Section 2241 - Power to grant writ

    28 U.S.C. § 2241   Cited 80,185 times   55 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts authority to determine whether detention is "in violation of the . . . laws . . . of the United States"

  7. Rule 1005 - Public records

    Mont. Code § 1005

    The contents of an official record, or of a document authorized to be recorded or filed and actually recorded or filed, including data compilations in any form, if otherwise admissible, may be proved by copy, certified as correct in accordance with Rule 902 or testified to be correct by a witness who has compared it with the original. If a copy which complies with the foregoing cannot be obtained by the exercise of reasonable diligence, then other evidence of the contents may be given. § 1005, MCA