17 Cited authorities

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

    509 U.S. 579 (1993)   Cited 26,135 times   224 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a trial judge must ensure that all admitted expert testimony "is not only relevant, but reliable"
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael

    526 U.S. 137 (1999)   Cited 12,541 times   28 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Daubert gatekeeping standard applies not only to "scientific testimony" but also to "all expert testimony"
  3. General Electric Co. v. Joiner

    522 U.S. 136 (1997)   Cited 4,833 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that under the abuse of discretion standard the appellate court will not reverse unless the ruling is manifestly erroneous
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

    43 F.3d 1311 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 1,268 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that expert testimony was inadmissible based on its unreliable methodology notwithstanding "the impressive qualifications of plaintiffs' experts"
  5. Primiano v. Cook

    598 F.3d 558 (9th Cir. 2010)   Cited 738 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding expert physician's opinions admissible based on that physician's use of "knowledge and experience" "against a background of peer-reviewed literature" to evaluate a patient's medical records and imaging studies
  6. Claar v. Burlington Northern R. Co.

    29 F.3d 499 (9th Cir. 1994)   Cited 444 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in order to avoid summary judgment, the plaintiffs in a FELA action were required to produce expert testimony that exposure to chemicals played a part in causing their injuries
  7. Keegan v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.

    838 F. Supp. 2d 929 (C.D. Cal. 2012)   Cited 139 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Song-Beverley does not impose a privity requirement
  8. Gallagher ex rel. National Packaging Solutions Group Trust v. Southern Source Packaging, LLC

    568 F. Supp. 2d 624 (E.D.N.C. 2008)   Cited 101 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that where an expert denied having an opinion on an issue, he was not qualified under Rule 702 to offer an opinion on it
  9. Cabrera v. Cordis Corporation

    134 F.3d 1418 (9th Cir. 1998)   Cited 62 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Blais's opinions were "the antithesis of the scientifically reliable expert opinion admissible under Daubert and Rule 702"
  10. U.S. v. 99.66 Acres of Land

    970 F.2d 651 (9th Cir. 1992)   Cited 68 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that landowner's testimony based on “lot method” was properly excluded in condemnation case involving property that owner proposed to develop as mobile home park where subdivision development was speculative
  11. Rule 702 - Testimony by Expert Witnesses

    Fed. R. Evid. 702   Cited 26,449 times   251 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the Daubert standard
  12. Rule 403 - Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons

    Fed. R. Evid. 403   Cited 22,388 times   81 Legal Analyses
    Adopting a similar standard, but requiring the probative value to be "substantially outweighed" by these risks
  13. Rule 104 - Preliminary Questions

    Fed. R. Evid. 104   Cited 3,287 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Requiring proof of facts necessary to establish relevance