5 Cited authorities

  1. Minn–Chem, Inc. v. Agrium Inc.

    683 F.3d 845 (7th Cir. 2012)   Cited 240 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that import exclusion applied because transactions in which plaintiffs purchased potash directly from foreign cartel members constitute import commerce
  2. In re Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation

    240 F.R.D. 56 (E.D.N.Y. 2006)   Cited 50 times
    Deciding first that all applicant counsel were “adequate” under the four Rule 23 factors before weighing how one group's “baggage” of having already entered into settlements with the defendants should affect the selection of interim counsel
  3. Donaldson v. Pharmacia Pension Plan

    435 F. Supp. 2d 853 (S.D. Ill. 2006)   Cited 18 times

    Civil No. 06-003-GPM. June 14, 2006. Jerome J. Schlichter, Schlichter, Bogard, Swansea, IL, Matthew H. Armstrong, Schlichter, Bogard et al., St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiffs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MURPHY, Chief Judge. This action is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint brought by Defendants Pharmacia Cash Balance Pension Plan, Pharmacia Corporation, Pharmacia Upjohn Company, and Pfizer, Inc. (Doc. 25). For the following reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED. Defendant

  4. In re Sorbates Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation

    Master File No. C 98-4886 MMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2002)

    Master File No. C 98-4886 MMC November 15, 2002 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANTS UENO FINE CHEMICALS INDUSTRY LTD. AND UENO FINE CHEMECHALS INDUSTRY (USA), INC. AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PLAN OF ALLOCATION, AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES AND AWARDS TO CLASS REPRESENTATIVES MAXINE M. CHESNEY, United States District Court Judge The Court, having considered Class Plaintiffs' Motion for Final Approval of Settlement of Class Action, Motion for Award of Attorneys Fees, and the memorandum

  5. Rule 23 - Class Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 23   Cited 34,647 times   1231 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"