RESPONSE in Support re MOTION to Dismiss 1043 Stipulation Plaintiff's' Second Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint, Or, In The Alternative, Motion For A More Definite Statement MOTION to Dismiss 1043 Stipulation Plaintiff's' Second Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint, Or, In The Alternative, Motion For A More Definite Statement
550 U.S. 544 (2007) Cited 265,662 times 364 Legal Analyses
Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
457 U.S. 991 (1982) Cited 2,785 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that nursing home is not a state actor in part because provision of nursing home services is not a traditional and exclusive sovereign function
Holding that evidence of damages was legally insufficient and overly speculative where the interested party testified that, had he known the truth, he would have increased his bid from $600,000 to $1.3 million, a bid that likely would have never been accepted by the offending party
Holding that plaintiffs are required to "present each claim for relief in a separate count" rather than asserting numerous claims within a single count
Deciding that the third amended complaint, which contained 127 paragraphs, all incorporated by reference into nine separate counts created an "onerous task" for the trial court to sift through
Holding that under the terms of a similar deed of trust, the mortgagee was entitled to collect the insurance proceeds after a fire and “to apply such proceeds to the indebtedness and pay the remainder to [the mortgagor]”
Granting summary judgment where plaintiff alleged no concrete damages as a result of the alleged breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing
Holding that "each claim must be analyzed separately, and a claim cannot be asserted on behalf of a class unless at least one named plaintiff has suffered the injury that gives rise to that claim"