§Why CasetextPricing

In Re: Borders Group, Inc.

MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 4 MOTION to Dismiss /Notice of Appellees' Motion to Dismiss Appeal.. Document

11 Cited authorities

  1. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Visa U.S.A., Inc.

    396 F.3d 96 (2d Cir. 2005)   Cited 755 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that decision to grant or reject objector's motion for discovery regarding fairness of settlement depended on "whether or not the District Court had before it sufficient facts intelligently to approve the settlement offer"

  2. In re Enron Corp.

    419 F.3d 115 (2d Cir. 2005)   Cited 293 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in determining that claimant's six month delay in filing proof of claim favored the debtor

  3. In re Nortel Networks

    539 F.3d 129 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 227 times
    Holding that a $34 million fee representing a 2.04 multiplier was "toward the lower end of reasonable fee awards"

  4. Medforms, Inc. v. Healthcare Management

    290 F.3d 98 (2d Cir. 2002)   Cited 110 times
    Holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing a computer programmer to testify "based on his everyday experience as a computer programmer and specifically on his work on [the copyrighted software]," because that testimony was "not based on scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge within the scope of expert testimony"

  5. Katel Ltd. Liability Co. v. AT&T Corp.

    607 F.3d 60 (2d Cir. 2010)   Cited 76 times
    Affirming a grant of summary judgment where inserting a word not present in an agreement would lead to an “illogical” result

  6. Kamagate v. Ashcroft

    385 F.3d 144 (2d Cir. 2004)   Cited 65 times
    Holding that a conspiracy to utter and possess counterfeit securities is an aggravated felony because it is related to the crime of counterfeiting

  7. In re BGI, Inc.

    476 B.R. 812 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2012)   Cited 15 times
    Holding that publication in the New York Times provided adequate notice to unknown creditors

  8. Sprint Nextel Corp. v. DBSD North America, Inc. (In re DBSD North America, Inc.)

    427 B.R. 245 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)   Cited 3 times
    Finding that the primary issue of joint and several liability was within the conventional expertise of the court and not principally within the FCC's expertise

  9. IN RE HAAS

    BAP No. N.H. 99-012 (B.A.P. 1st Cir. Oct. 21, 1999)

    BAP No. N.H. 99-012 October 21, 1999 Joseph S. Haas, Jr., on brief for the appellant. Lawrence P. Sumski, on brief for the appellee. Before Queenan, Kenner and Feeney, U.S. Bankruptcy Judges Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Hampshire (Hon. Mark W. Vaughn, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge) Per Curiam. I. INTRODUCTION The matter before the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel is the "Appeal" filed by Joseph Sanders Haas, Jr., a Chapter 13 Debtor ("Haas" or the "Debtor"), on January

  10. Section 158 - Appeals

    28 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 18,097 times   57 Legal Analyses
    Granting district courts appellate jurisdiction over "final judgments, orders, and decrees" of bankruptcy courts

  11. Rule 8011 - Filing and Service; Signature

    Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8011   Cited 59 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing that a party's brief is timely filed with the district court "if, on or before the last day for filing, [the brief] is . . . mailed to the clerk by first-class mail - or other class of mail that is at least as expeditious," with "postage prepaid"