30 Cited authorities

Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife
504 U.S. 555 (1992) Cited 27,710 times 138 Legal Analyses
Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"
Daimlerchrysler Corp. v. Cuno
547 U.S. 332 (2006) Cited 2,628 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that an injury a plaintiff "suffers in some indefinite way in common with people generally" is not a cognizable injury-in-fact
Allen v. Wright
468 U.S. 737 (1984) Cited 4,749 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that, even when plaintiffs allege "one of the most serious injuries recognized in our legal system," it's not justiciable where "the chain of causation between the challenged Government conduct and the asserted injury are far too weak for the chain as a whole to sustain respondents' standing"
Valley Forge College v. Americans United
454 U.S. 464 (1982) Cited 4,965 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the psychological consequence presumably produced by observation of conduct with which one disagrees ... is not an injury sufficient to confer standing under Art. III, even though the disagreement is phrased in constitutional terms"
Califano v. Sanders
430 U.S. 99 (1977) Cited 4,272 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the APA is not to be interpreted as an implied grant of subject-matter jurisdiction to review agency actions"
Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner
387 U.S. 136 (1967) Cited 5,277 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that plaintiffs subject to a regulation had standing to challenge it even though the Attorney General had yet to "authorize criminal and seizure actions for violations of the statute"
National Park Hospitality Assn. v. Dept. of Interior
538 U.S. 803 (2003) Cited 1,005 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that although the question presented was purely legal and the rule constituted final action, further factual development would "significantly advance our ability to deal with the legal issues presented" so the matter was not ripe for judicial review
Federal Election Comm'n v. Akins
524 U.S. 11 (1998) Cited 778 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that inability to procure information to which Congress has created a right in the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 qualifies as concrete injury satisfying Article III's standing requirement
Ex Parte Young
209 U.S. 123 (1908) Cited 10,785 times 22 Legal Analyses
Holding that federal courts may enjoin state officials to conform their conduct to federal law
Rodriguez v. United States
480 U.S. 522 (1987) Cited 401 times 4 Legal Analyses
Finding no irreconcilable conflict between a minimum sentence and the "suspension authority" of § 3651
Section 158 - Unfair labor practices
29 U.S.C. § 158 Cited 10,268 times 80 Legal Analyses
Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355
Section 1531 - Congressional findings and declaration of purposes and policy
16 U.S.C. § 1531 Cited 1,668 times 26 Legal Analyses
Finding and declaring that "various species of fish, wildlife, and plants in the United States have been rendered extinct" while "other species ... have been so depleted in numbers that they are in danger of or threatened with extinction ...."

Idaho Building and Construction Trades Council, AFL-CIO et al v. Wasden

30 Cited authorities

Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"

Holding that an injury a plaintiff "suffers in some indefinite way in common with people generally" is not a cognizable injury-in-fact

Holding that "the psychological consequence presumably produced by observation of conduct with which one disagrees ... is not an injury sufficient to confer standing under Art. III, even though the disagreement is phrased in constitutional terms"

Holding that "the APA is not to be interpreted as an implied grant of subject-matter jurisdiction to review agency actions"

Holding that plaintiffs subject to a regulation had standing to challenge it even though the Attorney General had yet to "authorize criminal and seizure actions for violations of the statute"

Holding that although the question presented was purely legal and the rule constituted final action, further factual development would "significantly advance our ability to deal with the legal issues presented" so the matter was not ripe for judicial review

Holding that inability to procure information to which Congress has created a right in the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 qualifies as concrete injury satisfying Article III's standing requirement

Holding that federal courts may enjoin state officials to conform their conduct to federal law

Finding no irreconcilable conflict between a minimum sentence and the "suspension authority" of § 3651

Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355

Finding and declaring that "various species of fish, wildlife, and plants in the United States have been rendered extinct" while "other species ... have been so depleted in numbers that they are in danger of or threatened with extinction ...."