8 Cited authorities

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United States

    449 U.S. 383 (1981)   Cited 4,203 times   128 Legal Analyses
    Holding that communications between corporate counsel and a corporation's employees made for the purpose of rendering legal advice are protected by the attorney-client privilege
  2. United States v. Graf

    610 F.3d 1148 (9th Cir. 2010)   Cited 339 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "when a Rule 29 motion is made on a specific ground, other grounds not raised are waived"
  3. In re Bieter Co.

    16 F.3d 929 (8th Cir. 1994)   Cited 211 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "disclosure of otherwise privileged documents" to the client's agent, an independent contractor, "did not destroy the privilege"
  4. In re Copper Market Antitrust Litigation

    200 F.R.D. 213 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)   Cited 161 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding consultant's "independent contractor status provides no basis for excluding [the consultant's] communications with [the corporations's] counsel from the protection of the attorney-client privilege."
  5. Export-Import Bank of United States v. Asia Pulp & Paper Co., Ltd.

    232 F.R.D. 103 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)   Cited 84 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a financial consultant was not the functional equivalent of an employee because although he was intimately involved in the client company’s restructuring talks and participated in communications with the company’s attorneys, his "efforts [were] precisely those that any financial consultant would likely make under the circumstances"
  6. F.T.C. v. Glaxosmithkline

    294 F.3d 141 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 53 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, for an institutional client, there is no waiver of privilege where the documents are shared within the organization with those who "needed to provide input to the legal department and/or receive the legal advice and strategies formulated by counsel"
  7. Trustees of Electrical Workers Local No. 26 Pension Trust Fund v. Trust Fund Advisors, Inc.

    266 F.R.D. 1 (D.D.C. 2010)   Cited 34 times
    Holding that Rule 502 "abolishe[d] the dreaded subject-matter waiver, i.e., that any disclosure of privileged matter worked a forfeiture of any other privileged information that pertained to the same subject matter"
  8. United States ex rel. Strom v. Scios, Inc.

    No. C05-3004 CRB (JSC) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2011)   Cited 5 times

    No. C05-3004 CRB (JSC) 10-12-2011 UNITED STATES ex rel. STROM, Plaintiff, v. SCIOS, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Defendants. JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (Dkt. No. 138) Now pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the Court's September 21, 2011 Order finding that communications made in a March 2002 telephone call between various Scios, Inc. ("Scios") employees and Scios outside consultant Dr. Lipicky are protected by the attorney-client