§Why CasetextPricing

Howard v. The Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. et al

MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 4 MOTION to Consolidate Cases 08-cv-2870, 08-cv-3334, 08-cv-3006, 08-cv-3035, 08-cv-3089, 08-cv-3326, 08-cv-3351.. Document

2 Cited authorities

  1. In re Sprint Corp. Erisa Litigation

    443 F. Supp. 2d 1249 (D. Kan. 2006)   Cited 48 times
    Finding that lodestar multiplier of 1.8 was “imminently reasonable” due to risks involved in litigating multi-year, contested MDL, where fee requested amounted to less than 16% of the benefit conferred on class members

  2. Rule 23 - Class Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 23   Cited 35,634 times   1242 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"