§Why CasetextPricing

Henry v. Gonzales et al

MOTION to Vacate 14 MOTION to Dismiss, Negative Averment in Support of the Petition's Motions

19 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Will

    449 U.S. 200 (1980)   Cited 354 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the rule of necessity is an exception to the recusal requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 455

  2. Yick Wo v. Hopkins

    118 U.S. 356 (1886)   Cited 3,046 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding enforcement of a California ordinance—governing the use of wooden buildings as laundromats—solely against Chinese owners violated the Equal Protection Clause

  3. Norton v. Shelby County

    118 U.S. 425 (1886)   Cited 488 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Norton, Mr. Justice Field declared: "An unconstitutional act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it creates no office; it is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed."

  4. Simon v. Craft

    182 U.S. 427 (1901)   Cited 152 times
    Holding that due process requires judicial proceedings provide "full notice and an opportunity to defend"

  5. Joiner v. State

    155 S.E.2d 8 (Ga. 1967)   Cited 26 times

    24057. ARGUED MAY 8, 1967. DECIDED MAY 18, 1967. Rape. Richmond Superior Court. Before Judge Kennedy. Albert Ingram, McDonald C. Haynie, Thomas M. Odom, G. Hughel Harrison, for appellant. George Hains, Solicitor General, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, G. Ernest Tidwell, Executive Assistant Attorney General, Hardaway Young, III, for appellee. UNDERCOFLER, Justice. Appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in this case because the transcript of evidence was not filed within the time prescribed

  6. United States v. Karnuth

    74 F. Supp. 660 (W.D.N.Y. 1947)   Cited 2 times

    Civ. No. 3588. November 28, 1947. Edward E. Franchot, of Niagara Falls, N.Y., for petitioner. Hon. George L. Grobe, U.S. Atty., and Herman I. Branse, Naturalization Examiner Review Immigration and Naturalization Service, both of Buffalo, N.Y. (R. Norman Kirchgraber, Asst. U.S. Atty., of Buffalo, N.Y., of counsel), for respondent. Habeas corpus proceeding by the United States of America, on the relation of Dorothy Winnifred Goodwin, against Arthur J. Karnuth, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization

  7. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 155,481 times   193 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."

  8. Section 2241 - Power to grant writ

    28 U.S.C. § 2241   Cited 80,132 times   55 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts authority to determine whether detention is "in violation of the . . . laws . . . of the United States"

  9. Rule 6 - Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 6   Cited 48,064 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."

  10. Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 9   Cited 38,822 times   316 Legal Analyses
    Permitting "[m]alice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of a person's mind [to] be alleged generally"

  11. Section 2 - Principals

    18 U.S.C. § 2   Cited 23,691 times   57 Legal Analyses
    Holding aiders and abettors punishable as principals under federal criminal law

  12. Section 552 - Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings

    5 U.S.C. § 552   Cited 12,150 times   555 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court's entering of a “Stipulation and Order” approving the parties' terms of dismissal did not amount to a “court-ordered consent decree” that would render the plaintiff the prevailing party

  13. Rule 24 - Intervention

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 24   Cited 9,135 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Granting the right of intervention to qualifying persons "unless existing parties adequately represent" them

  14. Rule 13 - Counterclaim and Crossclaim

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 13   Cited 4,911 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Determining whether counterclaims are compulsory

  15. Section 1333 - Admiralty, maritime and prize cases

    28 U.S.C. § 1333   Cited 4,490 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Granting federal district courts original jurisdiction over "[a]ny civil case of admiralty or maritime jurisdiction"

  16. Section 241 - Conspiracy against rights

    18 U.S.C. § 241   Cited 4,150 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Criminalizing civil-rights violations