13 Cited authorities

  1. DiLeo v. Ernst Young

    901 F.2d 624 (7th Cir. 1990)   Cited 1,588 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding accountants owe no duty "to search and sing"
  2. Pisciotta v. Old National Bancorp

    499 F.3d 629 (7th Cir. 2007)   Cited 761 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under Indiana state law, "allegations of increased risk of future identity theft . . . [are not] a harm that the law is prepared to remedy"
  3. Windy City v. CIT Tech. Fin. Servs.

    536 F.3d 663 (7th Cir. 2008)   Cited 648 times
    Holding that "unfair" practices claims are not subject to Rule 9(b) pleading because "neither fraud nor mistake is an element of unfair conduct under" the ICFA
  4. Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co.

    174 Ill. 2d 482 (Ill. 1996)   Cited 942 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statements "not made by Suzuki but by Suzuki dealers . . . cannot be the basis of a common law fraud count against Suzuki unless plaintiffs have adequately alleged that the dealers were the agents of Suzuki"
  5. Schiffels v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.

    978 F.2d 344 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 92 times
    Holding that a plaintiff-employee may have RICO standing when he alleges that he was fired in an attempt to prevent him from causing the conspiracy to unravel by disclosing scheme
  6. Huggins v. Citibank, N.A.

    355 S.C. 329 (S.C. 2003)   Cited 43 times
    Holding "[e]ven though it is foreseeable that injury may arise by the negligent issuance of a credit card, foreseeability alone does not give rise to duty"
  7. Costa v. Mauro Chevrolet, Inc.

    390 F. Supp. 2d 720 (N.D. Ill. 2005)   Cited 36 times
    Holding that failure to provide notice of an adverse action to the credit applicant is actionable under the ECOA without regard to allegations of discrimination
  8. Conder v. Union Planters Bank, N.A.

    384 F.3d 397 (7th Cir. 2004)   Cited 22 times
    Holding "in the face of the many cases that refuse in other settings to impose on banks a general duty of care toward persons who are not their customers" that no such duty is owed
  9. Cadleway v. Ossian State Bank

    478 F.3d 767 (7th Cir. 2007)   Cited 16 times
    Noting that even after the enactment of § 1367, the factors are applicable today
  10. Polzer v. TRW, Inc.

    256 A.D.2d 248 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)   Cited 13 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Polzer v. TRW, Inc., 682 N.Y.S.2d 194 (N.Y.App.Div. 1998), individuals in whose names an imposter had obtained credit cards sued the credit card issuers for negligent enablement of imposter fraud.
  11. Section 1367 - Supplemental jurisdiction

    28 U.S.C. § 1367   Cited 61,042 times   78 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in civil actions proceeding in federal court based solely on diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, the district court "shall not have supplemental jurisdiction" over "claims by plaintiffs against persons made parties under Rule . . . 24" or "over claims by persons . . seeking to intervene as plaintiffs under Rule 24," if "exercising supplemental jurisdiction over such claims would be inconsistent with the jurisdictional requirements of section 1332"