22 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 187,310 times   258 Legal Analyses
    Holding that government officials cannot be held liable for their subordinates' unconstitutional conduct under a theory of respondeat superior
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Envtl. Servs. (TOC), Inc.

    528 U.S. 167 (2000)   Cited 5,538 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs who curtailed their recreational activities on a river due to reasonable concerns about the effect of pollutant discharges into that river had standing
  3. Dodd v. United States

    545 U.S. 353 (2005)   Cited 1,188 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that limitations periods under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act begin on the date the right is recognized, not on the date it is made retroactively applicable
  4. Resnick v. Avmed, Inc.

    693 F.3d 1317 (11th Cir. 2012)   Cited 318 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding plaintiffs need only allege losses, not unreimbursed losses, for a cognizable injury in a Florida breach of implied contract claim
  5. Tandy v. City of Wichita

    380 F.3d 1277 (10th Cir. 2004)   Cited 242 times
    Holding that several plaintiffs who rode the Wichita bus system once could have standing
  6. Hancock v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co.

    701 F.3d 1248 (10th Cir. 2012)   Cited 136 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding internet agreement valid under Florida and Oklahoma law where process gave customer opportunity to review internet terms in scrolling text box; customer had to click an “I Agree” button to manifest assent to internet terms in order to continue with registration process and activation of internet service
  7. Hall v. Walter

    969 P.2d 224 (Colo. 1998)   Cited 166 times
    Holding that, when certain requirements are met, non-consumers have standing to maintain privatecause of action under Colorado Consumer Protection Act
  8. Edwards v. the First American Corp.

    385 F. App'x 629 (9th Cir. 2010)   Cited 101 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a statutory violation alone is enough
  9. Wimberly v. Ettenberg

    194 Colo. 163 (Colo. 1977)   Cited 168 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the plaintiffs' “[i]ndirect and incidental pecuniary injury” was insufficient to confer standing
  10. HealthOne of Denver, Inc. v. Unitedhealth Grp. Inc.

    805 F. Supp. 2d 1115 (D. Colo. 2011)   Cited 45 times
    In HealthONE of Denver, Inc. v. UnitedHealth Group Inc., 805 F. Supp. 2d at 1118, the plaintiffs brought a CCPA claim against the defendant for its use of a mark that incorporated the entirety of the plaintiffs' own mark.
  11. Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 9   Cited 31,017 times   257 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a party who alleged fraud or mistake to "state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud of mistake"
  12. Section 6-1-113 - Damages

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-113   Cited 85 times
    Providing damages under the CCPA of " The greater of: The amount of actual damages sustained; or Five hundred dollars"
  13. Section 6-1-718 - Ticket sales and resales - prohibitions - unlawful conditions - definitions

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-718   Cited 1 times

    (1) As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires: (a) "Operator" means a person or entity who owns, operates, or controls a place of entertainment or who promotes or produces entertainment and that sells a ticket to an event for original sale, including an employee of such person or entity. (b) "Original sale" means the first sale of a ticket by an operator. (c) "Place of entertainment" means a public or private entertainment facility, such as a stadium, arena, racetrack, museum