23 Cited authorities

  1. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife

    504 U.S. 555 (1992)   Cited 21,997 times   122 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a sufficient specification of when the injury in fact will occur is necessary
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner

    387 U.S. 136 (1967)   Cited 4,818 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the action at issue had a "sufficiently direct and immediate" impact on petitioners, such that judicial review was appropriate, because noncompliance risked "serious criminal and civil penalties"
  3. McCarthy v. Madigan

    503 U.S. 140 (1992)   Cited 1,609 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a prisoner was not required to exhaust the Bureau of Prisons' administrative procedure before making a Bivens claim for money damages
  4. Mathews v. Diaz

    426 U.S. 67 (1976)   Cited 894 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that congressional alienage-based restrictions on federal Medicare benefits did not violate due process
  5. McNary v. Haitian Refugee Center, Inc.

    498 U.S. 479 (1991)   Cited 412 times
    Holding that the INA did not strip jurisdiction over certain claims because otherwise "meaningful judicial review ... would be foreclosed"
  6. Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Reich

    510 U.S. 200 (1994)   Cited 329 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that petitioner's constitutional claims could first be brought before the agency
  7. Ex Parte Young

    209 U.S. 123 (1908)   Cited 8,776 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that federal courts may enjoin state officials to conform their conduct to federal law
  8. Telecommunications Research Action v. F.C.C

    750 F.2d 70 (D.C. Cir. 1984)   Cited 615 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a district court did not have jurisdiction to review a rule or issue a writ of mandamus because of a special review statute that assigned judicial review to the courts of appeals
  9. National Min. Ass'n v. Department of Labor

    292 F.3d 849 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 97 times
    Holding that a rule is impermissibly retroactive if "applied to claims that were pending on the regulations' effective date"
  10. Andrade v. Lauer

    729 F.2d 1475 (D.C. Cir. 1984)   Cited 129 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that exhaustion of CSRA remedies is not required when there is "complete divergence between the issues presented by the constitutional and personnel/statutory claims"
  11. Section 7217 - Commission oversight of the Board

    15 U.S.C. § 7217   Cited 8 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Incorporating 15 U.S.C. § 78s(c)