Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.

Holding that the supplemental jurisdiction statute permits the exercise of diversity jurisdiction over additional plaintiffs who fail to satisfy the minimum amount-in-controversy requirement, as long as the other elements of diversity jurisdiction are present and at least one named plaintiff does satisfy the amount-in-controversy requirement

Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Assoc. of the United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

Holding that " `settled course of behavior embodies the agency's informed judgment that, by pursuing that course, it will carry out the policies [of applicable statutes or regulations]'"

Lamie v. U.S. Trustee

Holding that courts should not add an "absent word" to a statute

Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe

Holding a decision is committed to agency discretion when there is "no law to apply"

Califano v. Sanders

Holding that "the APA is not to be interpreted as an implied grant of subject-matter jurisdiction to review agency actions"

Russello v. United States

Holding that where "Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another section of the same Act," courts presume that "Congress acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion"

Data Processing Service v. Camp

Holding that "[t]here can be no doubt" that the plaintiffs have Article III standing because they "allege that competition [resulting from the challenged regulation] might entail some future loss of profits for [them]"

United States v. Wheeler

Holding that "the prosecution of an Indian in a federal district court under the Major Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1153, when he has previously been convicted in a tribal court of a lesser included offense arising out of the same incident" is not barred by the Double Jeopardy Clause

United States v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Co.

Holding that claims for a refund of invalid export tax brought under a statute other than § 7422 were barred

National Credit Union Admin. v. 1st Nat. Bank Trust

Holding an interpretation was "impermissible under the first step of Chevron " in part because it created surplusage

Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

Section 706 - Scope of review

Granting courts jurisdiction to "compel agency action unlawfully held or unreasonably delayed"

Rule 25 - Substitution of Parties

Providing for the automatic substitution at the district-court level of public officers sued in their official capacities

Section 1903 - Definitions

Defining "Indian" as encompassing only members of federally recognized tribes

Section 2701 - Findings

Finding that “[f]ederal courts have held that section 81 of this title requires Secretarial review of management contracts dealing with Indian gaming, but does not provide standards for approval of such contracts”

Section 2710 - Tribal gaming ordinances

Providing "[n]et revenues . . . may be used to make per capita payments . . . only if" the tribe has already prepared a plan to meet its government essential services

Section 1301 - Definitions

Affirming Tribes' continued "powers of self-government"

Section 2703 - Definitions

Defining "class III gaming"

Section 465 - Transferred

Authorizing Secretary to acquire lands "in his discretion"

Section 1601 - Congressional findings and declaration of policy

Section 292.2 - How are key terms defined in this part?