§Why CasetextPricing

Foy et al v. Vanderbilt Capital Advisors, LLC et al

MOTION to Dismiss Vanderbilt Defendants and Patrick Livney for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction

30 Cited authorities

  1. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson

    444 U.S. 286 (1980)   Cited 10,815 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an Oklahoma court could not exercise personal jurisdiction over a car retailer when the retailer's only connection to Oklahoma was the fact that a car sold in New York became involved in an accident in Oklahoma

  2. Ticketmaster-New York, Inc. v. Alioto

    26 F.3d 201 (1st Cir. 1994)   Cited 646 times
    Holding that Massachusetts lacked personal jurisdiction over a California lawyer who gave a phone interview knowing his comments would form the basis of a newspaper article to be circulated in Massachusetts because the plaintiff failed to show that the defendant's interview responses constituted purposeful availment

  3. Wenz v. Memery Crystal

    55 F.3d 1503 (10th Cir. 1995)   Cited 620 times
    Holding that, under a similar long-arm provision, the tortious injury underlying an action for conversion of funds from London accounts by London-based tortfeasors occurred in London

  4. Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. Miller

    664 F.2d 899 (2d Cir. 1981)   Cited 964 times
    Holding that when the defendant challenges personal jurisdiction, a plaintiff need only make a prima facie showing of jurisdiction if the district court has not held an evidentiary hearing

  5. Rollins v. Ellwood

    141 Ill. 2d 244 (Ill. 1990)   Cited 354 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "[j]urisdiction is to be asserted only when it is fair, just, and reasonable to require a non-resident defendant to defend an action in Illinois."

  6. Bell Helicopter Textron v. Heliqwest Intern

    385 F.3d 1291 (10th Cir. 2004)   Cited 189 times
    Holding that although the lessor could potentially have foreseen that the helicopter would be used in western states with national forests, " general hope that a party will use a product in a general region is too remote an aspiration to qualify as purposeful availment in a specific state"

  7. Tercero v. Roman Cath. Diocese of Norwich

    132 N.M. 312 (N.M. 2002)   Cited 172 times
    Holding that the party asserting jurisdiction over a foreign defendant has the burden of establishing that fact

  8. Ten Mile Indus. Park v. Western Plains Serv

    810 F.2d 1518 (10th Cir. 1987)   Cited 202 times
    In Ten Mile Indust. Park v. Western Plains Serv. Corp., 810 F.2d 1518 (10th Cir. 1987), consolidated with Hubbell v. Western Plains Serv. Corp., 810 F.2d 1518 (10th Cir. 1987) and in Ponderosa Development Corp. v. Bjordahl, 787 F.2d 533 (10th Cir. 1986), it appears that various savings and loans, some or all of which are the lenders here, have argued lack of personal jurisdiction.

  9. Santa Fe Technologies, Inc. v. Argus Networks, Inc.

    131 N.M. 772 (N.M. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 104 times
    Holding that personal jurisdiction may be constitutionally based upon conspiracy so long as it is not based upon random or fortuitous contacts nor the unilateral acts of a third party and that some of the inquiry under the New Mexico long-arm statute may be equated with the due process standard of minimum contacts

  10. Zavala v. El Paso County Hospital District

    143 N.M. 36 (N.M. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 46 times
    Holding that a transfer agreement with the purpose of "promoting] the continuity of care and the timely transfer of patients and records" between two hospitals cannot by itself support the exercise of either general or specific personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant