12 Cited authorities

Camacho v. Bridgeport
523 F.3d 973 (9th Cir. 2008) Cited 1,462 times
Holding that fees-on-fees must be calculated using the lodestar method
Henry v. Gill Industries, Inc.
983 F.2d 943 (9th Cir. 1993) Cited 1,085 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that, in order to justify dismissal under Rule 37, "the losing party's non-compliance must be due to willfulness, fault, or bad faith"
Harris v. Marhoefer
24 F.3d 16 (9th Cir. 1994) Cited 476 times
Holding that plaintiffs may recover out-of-pocket expenses and expenses related to discovery and expert witnesses under § 1988
Calvo Fisher & Jacob LLP v. Lujan
234 Cal.App.4th 608 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015) Cited 48 times 1 Legal Analyses
In Calvo Fisher & Jacob LLP v. Lujan (2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 608, 620 (Calvo), we confirmed the principles governing here, beginning with this: "We had earlier described the standard of review in Thayer v. Wells Fargo Bank (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 819, 832-833: 'Because the sole issue before us... is the amount of fees awarded, our review is deferential. "
Shakey's Inc. v. Covalt
704 F.2d 426 (9th Cir. 1983) Cited 123 times
Holding that a written contract must be read as a whole
Manhart v. City of Los Angeles, Dept. of Water
652 F.2d 904 (9th Cir. 1981) Cited 62 times
Holding that plaintiffs are entitled to attorney's fees for time spent litigating the fees issue on appeal under Title VII's attorney's fee provision
Brown v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
No. C 11-03082 LB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2013) Cited 10 times
No. C 11-03082 LB 10-28-2013 ROSMINAH BROWN and ERIC LOHELA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. THE HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. LAUREL BEELER ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES [Re: ECF No. 145] INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs claim that Hain Celestial falsely advertises, markets, and labels certain Jason and Avalon Organics brand cosmetics products as organic. See Complaint, ECF No. 1 at 9. The parties had discovery
Woodland v. Viacom Inc.
255 F.R.D. 278 (D.D.C. 2008) Cited 14 times
Granting fee petition submitted by Morgan Lewis notwithstanding that the figures in the Laffey Matrix “are unquestionably lower”
Wolf v. Frank
555 F.2d 1213 (5th Cir. 1977) Cited 55 times
Allowing enhancement of 33 percent
Rosenfeld v. Southern Pacific Company
519 F.2d 527 (9th Cir. 1975) Cited 36 times
Rejecting argument that individual should not be assessed for attorney's fees since he was merely complying with state statute which was ultimately held to be unconstitutional
Rule 37 - Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions
Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 Cited 45,731 times 319 Legal Analyses
Holding that a party may be barred from using a witness if it fails to disclose the witness

Flowrider Surf, Ltd. et al v. Pacific Surf Designs, Inc.

12 Cited authorities

Holding that fees-on-fees must be calculated using the lodestar method

Holding that, in order to justify dismissal under Rule 37, "the losing party's non-compliance must be due to willfulness, fault, or bad faith"

Holding that plaintiffs may recover out-of-pocket expenses and expenses related to discovery and expert witnesses under § 1988

Holding that a written contract must be read as a whole

Holding that plaintiffs are entitled to attorney's fees for time spent litigating the fees issue on appeal under Title VII's attorney's fee provision

Granting fee petition submitted by Morgan Lewis notwithstanding that the figures in the Laffey Matrix “are unquestionably lower”

Allowing enhancement of 33 percent

Rejecting argument that individual should not be assessed for attorney's fees since he was merely complying with state statute which was ultimately held to be unconstitutional

Holding that a party may be barred from using a witness if it fails to disclose the witness