9 Cited authorities

  1. Daimler AG v. Bauman

    571 U.S. 117 (2014)   Cited 3,752 times   191 Legal Analyses
    Holding that foreign corporations may not be subject to general jurisdiction "whenever they have an in-state subsidiary or affiliate"
  2. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Oper. v. Brown

    564 U.S. 915 (2011)   Cited 3,547 times   60 Legal Analyses
    Holding "the sales of petitioners' tires sporadically made in North Carolina through intermediaries" insufficient to support general jurisdiction
  3. Bechtel v. Liberty Nat. Bank

    534 F.2d 1335 (9th Cir. 1976)   Cited 77 times
    Holding that while some courts hold that Rule 12(b) motions must be made within the time period to file a responsive pleading, the rule itself only requires that such motions must be made before any allowed responsive pleading
  4. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. RLJ Lodging Trust

    Case No.: 13 C 00758 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 23, 2013)   Cited 1 times
    Asserting general jurisdiction where foreign defendant derived $29 million in revenue from Illinois in 2011, which amounted to twelve percent of its nationwide revenue for that year, although it was not registered to do business in Illinois
  5. Seal v. Riverside Federal Sav. Bank

    825 F. Supp. 686 (E.D. Pa. 1993)   Cited 18 times
    Finding plaintiff ratified a contract induced under economic duress
  6. Friedman v. World Transp., Inc.

    636 F. Supp. 685 (N.D. Ill. 1986)   Cited 23 times
    Stating that "[w]hile The Bremen was an admiralty case, set in an international context, its teachings are not limited to such cases . . . [l]ower federal courts have consistently applied The Bremen analysis to cases involving only domestic parties and causes of action other than admiralty"
  7. Cross v. Simons

    729 F. Supp. 588 (N.D. Ill. 1989)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that an allegation that victims were "U.S. Citizens" was insufficient
  8. MacNeil v. Whittemore

    254 F.2d 820 (2d Cir. 1958)   Cited 17 times
    Holding trial court properly permitted defendant to amend his motion to dismiss two days after original motion and nearly a month before the hearing on the motion
  9. Roller Derby Associates v. Seltzer

    54 F.R.D. 556 (N.D. Ill. 1972)   Cited 4 times
    In Roller Derby Associates v. Seltzer, 54 F.R.D. 556, the Court held that under Illinois law, actions by partnerships must be brought in the name of the partners, and not in the firm name.