9 Cited authorities

Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail
502 U.S. 367 (1992) Cited 1,145 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding modification of consent decree appropriate under Rule 60(b) when its continuance becomes "unworkable because of unforeseen obstacles"
United States v. Loew's Inc.
371 U.S. 38 (1962) Cited 247 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that tying agreements "are an object of antitrust concern for two reasons — they may force buyers into giving up the purchase of substitutes for the tied product, and they may destroy the free access of competing suppliers of the tied product to the consuming market"
United States v. United Shoe Corp.
391 U.S. 244 (1968) Cited 205 times
Holding that a court can modify a consent decree "upon an appropriate showing" of "the specific facts and circumstances" in the particular case
Exxon Corp. v. Texas Motor Exchange of Houston
628 F.2d 500 (5th Cir. 1980) Cited 262 times
Holding that two companies involved in car care had "a strong similarity between their wares and services" even though one sold car parts and the other did not
McGregor v. Chierico
206 F.3d 1378 (11th Cir. 2000) Cited 138 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that a court cannot use its contempt power to forfeit assets of a contemnor also owned by a third party
F.T.C. v. Think Achievement Corp.
312 F.3d 259 (7th Cir. 2002) Cited 33 times
Holding that an advertisement containing a money-back guarantee could still be fraudulent
F.T.C. v. Think Achievement Corp., (N.D.Ind. 2000)
144 F. Supp. 2d 1013 (N.D. Ind. 2000) Cited 31 times
Enjoining defendants from assisting others who are engaged in the business of telemarketing or the business of marketing career advisory goods or services
Rule 60 - Relief from a Judgment or Order
Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 Cited 53,381 times 143 Legal Analyses
Granting relief from the operation of a judgment
Section 45 - Unfair methods of competition unlawful; prevention by Commission
15 U.S.C. § 45 Cited 3,850 times 543 Legal Analyses
Providing court-ordered monetary penalties against anyone who engages in conduct previously identified as prohibited in a final cease and desist order, but only if the violator acted with "actual knowledge that such act or practice is unfair or deceptive"

Federal Trade Commission v. Your Yellow Book Inc et al

9 Cited authorities

Holding modification of consent decree appropriate under Rule 60(b) when its continuance becomes "unworkable because of unforeseen obstacles"

Holding that tying agreements "are an object of antitrust concern for two reasons — they may force buyers into giving up the purchase of substitutes for the tied product, and they may destroy the free access of competing suppliers of the tied product to the consuming market"

Holding that a court can modify a consent decree "upon an appropriate showing" of "the specific facts and circumstances" in the particular case

Holding that two companies involved in car care had "a strong similarity between their wares and services" even though one sold car parts and the other did not

Holding that a court cannot use its contempt power to forfeit assets of a contemnor also owned by a third party

Holding that an advertisement containing a money-back guarantee could still be fraudulent

Enjoining defendants from assisting others who are engaged in the business of telemarketing or the business of marketing career advisory goods or services

Granting relief from the operation of a judgment

Providing court-ordered monetary penalties against anyone who engages in conduct previously identified as prohibited in a final cease and desist order, but only if the violator acted with "actual knowledge that such act or practice is unfair or deceptive"