9 Cited authorities

  1. Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail

    502 U.S. 367 (1992)   Cited 1,008 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding modification of consent decree appropriate under Rule 60(b) when its continuance becomes "unworkable because of unforeseen obstacles"
  2. United States v. Loew's Inc.

    371 U.S. 38 (1962)   Cited 247 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that tying agreements "are an object of antitrust concern for two reasons — they may force buyers into giving up the purchase of substitutes for the tied product, and they may destroy the free access of competing suppliers of the tied product to the consuming market"
  3. United States v. United Shoe Corp.

    391 U.S. 244 (1968)   Cited 193 times
    Holding that a court can modify a consent decree "upon an appropriate showing" of "the specific facts and circumstances" in the particular case
  4. Exxon Corp. v. Texas Motor Exchange of Houston

    628 F.2d 500 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 233 times
    Holding that two companies involved in car care had "a strong similarity between their wares and services" even though one sold car parts and the other did not
  5. McGregor v. Chierico

    206 F.3d 1378 (11th Cir. 2000)   Cited 114 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court cannot use its contempt power to forfeit assets of a contemnor also owned by a third party
  6. F.T.C. v. Think Achievement Corp.

    312 F.3d 259 (7th Cir. 2002)   Cited 32 times
    Holding that an advertisement containing a money-back guarantee could still be fraudulent
  7. F.T.C. v. Think Achievement Corp., (N.D.Ind. 2000)

    144 F. Supp. 2d 1013 (N.D. Ind. 2000)   Cited 30 times
    Enjoining defendants from assisting others who are engaged in the business of telemarketing or the business of marketing career advisory goods or services
  8. Rule 60 - Relief from a Judgment or Order

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 60   Cited 44,727 times   119 Legal Analyses
    Granting relief from the operation of a judgment
  9. Section 45 - Unfair methods of competition unlawful; prevention by Commission

    15 U.S.C. § 45   Cited 3,534 times   419 Legal Analyses
    Providing court-ordered monetary penalties against anyone who engages in conduct previously identified as prohibited in a final cease and desist order, but only if the violator acted with "actual knowledge that such act or practice is unfair or deceptive"