§Why CasetextPricing

Alfred G. Osterweil, Appellant,v.George R. Bartlett, III, Respondent.

Brief

18 Cited authorities

  1. District of Columbia et al. v. Heller

    554 U.S. 570 (2008)   Cited 3,421 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Holding it irrelevant to the constitutionality of D.C.'s "handgun" ban that the law allowed citizens the possession of substitutes, like "long guns"

  2. McDonald v. City of Chicago

    561 U.S. 742 (2010)   Cited 2,249 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Second Amendment applies to the states, through incorporation under the Fourteenth Amendment

  3. Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Ass'n

    485 U.S. 439 (1988)   Cited 787 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an adherent was not entitled to challenge a third party's actions that offended his beliefs

  4. Ashwander v. Valley Authority

    297 U.S. 288 (1936)   Cited 2,330 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "Court will not pass upon a constitutional question although properly presented by the record, if there is also present some other ground upon which the case may be disposed of"

  5. Peterson v. Martinez

    707 F.3d 1197 (10th Cir. 2013)   Cited 228 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding the Second Amendment does not guarantee the right to carry a concealed firearm in public

  6. Engel v. CBS, Inc.

    93 N.Y.2d 195 (N.Y. 1999)   Cited 181 times
    Holding that the special injury requirement in wrongful civil proceedings does not require the actual imposition of a provisional remedy; what is required is "some concrete harm that is considerably more cumbersome than the physical, psychological or financial demands of defending a lawsuit"

  7. Overstock.com, Inc. v. N.Y. State Dep't of Taxation & Fin.

    2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 2102 (N.Y. 2013)   Cited 60 times   4 Legal Analyses

    2013-03-28 OVERSTOCK.COM, INC., Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE et al., Respondents. Amazon.com, LLC, et al., Appellants, v. New York State Department of Taxation and Finance et al., Respondents. Bracewell & Giuliani LLP, New York City (Daniel S. Connolly and Rachel B. Goldman of counsel), for appellant in the first above-entitled action. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, New York City (Randy M. Mastro and Oliver M. Olanoff of counsel), and Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP (Julian

  8. Bach v. Pataki

    408 F.3d 75 (2d Cir. 2005)   Cited 75 times
    Holding that a New York regulation restricting applications for handgun licenses to nonresidents with a primary place of business in the State did not violate the Privileges and Immunities Clause because the "discrimination [was] sufficiently justified by New York's public safety interest in monitoring handgun licensees" and its inability to access sufficient information about the qualifications of nonresidents

  9. Rooney v. Tyson

    91 N.Y.2d 685 (N.Y. 1998)   Cited 87 times
    Holding "absent an agreement establishing a fixed duration, an employment relationship is presumed to be a hiring at will, terminable at any time by either party."

  10. Antone v. General Motors Corp.

    64 N.Y.2d 20 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 121 times
    Holding that a personal injury plaintiff's residency for purposes of CPLR § 202 was determined at the time of the injury