No. 113 Argued September 5, 2002. Decided October 22, 2002. APPEAL, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, entered November 8, 2001, which affirmed an order and judgment of the Supreme Court (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered in New York County, granting a motion by plaintiff for summary judgment to declare that defendants' failure to include "per session" compensation in the computation of teachers' retirement
No. 2007-07303. January 13, 2009. APPEA L from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roy S. Mahon, J.), entered July 12, 2007 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The order and judgment, insofar as appealed from, denied that branch of the motion of respondent New York State Racing and Wagering Board pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the proceeding as time-barred, granted the petition and enjoined respondent from preventing petitioner from practicing
Argued March 22, 1988 Decided May 3, 1988 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department. Peter L. Zimroth, Corporation Counsel (James F. Eller, Glenn Newman and Stanley Buchsbaum of counsel), for appellant. Stephen R. Sugrue and Stephen S. Ziegler for respondent. Per Curiam. Petitioner, a corporation engaged in the operation of a Spanish language television network, leased commercial office space in Manhattan in September 1981. The 15 1/2-year lease was
96919. April 14, 2005. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Mulvey, J.), entered August 20, 2004 in Tompkins County, which, inter alia, dismissed petitioners' application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of Ithaca granting respondent Cayuga Country Homes, Inc. a building permit. True, Walsh Miller L.L.P., Ithaca (Adam R. Schaye of counsel), for appellants. Martin A. Luster, City Attorney, Ithaca (Patricia Dunn
The commissioner shall: (a) After consultation with the director of the budget, the commissioner of labor, and the commissioner of taxation and finance, promulgate regulations, which, notwithstanding any provisions to the contrary in the state administrative procedure act, may be adopted on an emergency basis, governing (i) criteria of eligibility for empire zone designation, provided, however, that such criteria be approved by the director of the budget; (ii) the application process; (iii) the certification
(a) The commissioner may revoke the certification of a business enterprise upon a finding of any one of the following: (1) the business enterprise made material misrepresentations of fact on its application for certification or on a business annual report, or the business enterprise failed to disclose facts in its application for certification that would constitute grounds for not issuing a certification; (2) the business enterprise has failed to construct, expand, rehabilitate, invest in or operate