§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Clifford Graham, Appellant.

Brief

50 Cited authorities

  1. Miranda v. Arizona

    384 U.S. 436 (1966)   Cited 60,228 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statements obtained by custodial interrogation of a criminal defendant without warning of constitutional rights are inadmissible under the Fifth Amendment

  2. Boykin v. Alabama

    395 U.S. 238 (1969)   Cited 13,220 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a silent record is insufficient for a waiver of certain specified rights not at issue here

  3. Dickerson v. United States

    530 U.S. 428 (2000)   Cited 2,284 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “the protections announced in Miranda ” are “constitutionally required”

  4. Moncrieffe v. Holder

    569 U.S. 184 (2013)   Cited 1,334 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that sharing marijuana not an aggravated felony

  5. Moran v. Burbine

    475 U.S. 412 (1986)   Cited 4,084 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth Amendment does not apply to statements a defendant makes to police before he is indicted

  6. Escobedo v. Illinois

    378 U.S. 478 (1964)   Cited 4,237 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when a suspect is interrogated with the goal of eliciting incriminating statements and the suspect has not been warned about his or her right to remain silent, the denial of the opportunity to consult with the suspect's attorney is a violation of the Sixth Amendment

  7. Withrow v. Williams

    507 U.S. 680 (1993)   Cited 1,162 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that maturity is a relevant factor in analyzing the presence of police coercion

  8. Michigan v. Mosley

    423 U.S. 96 (1975)   Cited 2,290 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding a statement made after the suspect's invocation of his Miranda rights admissible when questioning resumed “only after the passage of a significant period of time and the provision of a fresh set of warnings,” and the second interrogation was restricted “to a crime that had not been a subject of the earlier interrogation”

  9. Brewer v. Williams

    430 U.S. 387 (1977)   Cited 2,118 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding a police officer violated Williams' Sixth Amendment right to counsel by “deliberately and designedly set[ting] out to elicit information from Williams just as surely as and perhaps more effectively than if he had formally interrogated him”

  10. New York v. Quarles

    467 U.S. 649 (1984)   Cited 1,573 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an officer's subjective motivation is irrelevant to determining the applicability of the public safety exception to Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694

  11. Section 3501 - Admissibility of confessions

    18 U.S.C. § 3501   Cited 988 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Finding of voluntariness is possible if admission made within six hours of arrest or detention; thereafter court must find reasonable ground for delay in arraigning defendant