92 Cited authorities

  1. Strickland v. Washington

    466 U.S. 668 (1984)   Cited 135,742 times   173 Legal Analyses
    Holding that prejudice for IAC claims requires showing "that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different"
  2. Illinois v. Wardlow

    528 U.S. 119 (2000)   Cited 4,114 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Holding that whether the defendant was in a high crime area was a relevant factor when determining reasonable suspicion
  3. Brady v. Maryland

    373 U.S. 83 (1963)   Cited 33,236 times   132 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution"
  4. Gray v. Netherland

    518 U.S. 152 (1996)   Cited 3,264 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that procedural default is not implicated for an unexhausted claim until it is established that further resort to state law would be futile, and it is clear that state law would procedurally bar the claims
  5. Kimmelman v. Morrison

    477 U.S. 365 (1986)   Cited 4,959 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim for ineffective assistance of trial counsel is cognizable on habeas review where the petitioner alleged that his trial counsel failed to raise a meritorious argument to exclude evidence seized in an unconstitutional search
  6. Florida v. J. L.

    529 U.S. 266 (2000)   Cited 1,959 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding an anonymous tip that a young black man in a plaid shirt was carrying a gun insufficient to create reasonable suspicion
  7. Navarette v. California

    572 U.S. 393 (2014)   Cited 912 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding police obtained reasonable suspicion by "confirming the innocent details" of an anonymous tip
  8. People v. Stultz

    2 N.Y.3d 277 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 2,841 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding "a defendant's showing of prejudice [to be] a significant but not indispensable element in assessing meaningful representation," focusing instead on "the fairness of the proceedings as a whole"
  9. People v. Benevento

    91 N.Y.2d 708 (N.Y. 1998)   Cited 3,679 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713-14 (1998), the New York Court of Appeals held that "meaningful representation" included a prejudice component which focuses on the "fairness of the process as a whole rather than [any] particular impact on the outcome of the case."
  10. United States v. Mechanik

    475 U.S. 66 (1986)   Cited 1,112 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding conviction by the petit jury shows there was probable cause and renders harmless lack of probable cause for the indictment