§Why CasetextPricing

Ezell et al., v. City of Chicago

REPLY

9 Cited authorities

  1. Wolff v. McDonnell

    418 U.S. 539 (1974)   Cited 19,221 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that declaratory judgment as a predicate to a damages award would not be barred, but that a civil rights claim that would affect the duration of incarceration is foreclosed by Preiser

  2. Jenkins v. McKeithen

    395 U.S. 411 (1969)   Cited 7,580 times
    Holding that in 12(b) motions, material allegations are taken as true and liberally construed in favor of non-moving party

  3. Christian Legal Society v. Walker

    453 F.3d 853 (7th Cir. 2006)   Cited 305 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that likelihood of success on First Amendment violation presumed to constitute irreparable injury

  4. Federation of Adver. Ind. Rep. v. City

    326 F.3d 924 (7th Cir. 2003)   Cited 140 times
    Holding that a suit became moot when the challenged ordinance had been repealed and saying that "we have repeatedly held that the complete repeal of a challenged law renders a case moot, unless there is evidence creating a reasonable expectation that the City will reenact the ordinance or one substantially similar"

  5. Rembert v. Sheahan

    62 F.3d 937 (7th Cir. 1995)   Cited 31 times
    Declining to address mootness in the face of an insufficient record

  6. Medeco Security Locks, Inc. v. Swiderek

    680 F.2d 37 (7th Cir. 1981)   Cited 22 times

    No. 80-2784. Argued May 1, 1981. This appeal was originally decided by unreported order on May 26, 1981. See Circuit Rule 35. The court has subsequently decided to issue the decision as an opinion. Decided May 26, 1981. James T. Fitzgibbon, Fitzgibbon, Roehrig, Greenawalt Gilhooly, Chicago, Ill., for defendants-appellants. G. Franklin Rothwell, Bernard, Rothwell Brown, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Before

  7. Loewen Group International v. Haberichter

    912 F. Supp. 388 (N.D. Ill. 1996)   Cited 3 times

    No. 93 C 7377 January 9, 1996 Kevin E. White, E. King Poor, Catherine W. Joyce, Winston Strawn, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff. Patrick Joseph Fanning, Kathryn M. Reidy, Knight, Hoppe, Fanning Knight, Ltd., Des Plaines, IL, for defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ASPEN, Chief Judge: Plaintiff Loewen Group International, Inc. ("Loewen") brings this four-count complaint against William J. Haberichter for breach of contract (Count I), breach of a covenant not to compete (Count II), breach of fiduciary

  8. Rule 52 - Findings and Conclusions by the Court; Judgment on Partial Findings

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 52   Cited 26,367 times   100 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that a "reviewing court must give due regard to the trial court's opportunity to judge the witnesses' credibility"

  9. Rule 65 - Injunctions and Restraining Orders

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 65   Cited 22,334 times   87 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing court's ability to enter emergency order with less than full adversary hearing and even, in appropriate circumstances, without notice