Holding that conclusory allegation that party "monopolized and continued to monopolize" the relevant market, without allegations of market share, was insufficient to survive motion to dismiss
Observing that 28 U.S.C. § 1659, which provides that a "district court shall stay . .. proceedings in the civil action with respect to any claim that involves the same issues involved in the same proceeding" before the International Trade Commission, was enacted "to prevent infringement proceedings from occurring in two forums at the same time"
Distinguishing between civil actions and proceedings before the International Trade Commission, and permitting stay of civil action in favor of overlapping ITC proceedings in certain circumstances