35 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 239,217 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 218,869 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
  3. Lama Holding Co. v. Smith Barney Inc.

    88 N.Y.2d 413 (N.Y. 1996)   Cited 2,183 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that damages that are "undeterminable" or speculative cannot serve as the basis of a fraud claim
  4. Knight v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co.

    804 F.2d 9 (2d Cir. 1986)   Cited 2,240 times
    Holding that a party cannot rely on "mere speculation or conjecture as to the true nature of the facts to overcome a motion for summary judgment"
  5. Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Applera Corp.

    599 F.3d 1325 (Fed. Cir. 2010)   Cited 226 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the phrase "not interfering substantially" is sufficiently definite because a skilled artisan could use "the examples in the specification to determine whether interference with hybridization is substantial"
  6. Quarles v. General Motors Corp.

    758 F.2d 839 (2d Cir. 1985)   Cited 453 times
    Noting that "mere conjecture or speculation by the party resisting summary judgment does not provide a basis upon which to deny the motion"
  7. TVT Records v. The Island Def Jam Music Group

    412 F.3d 82 (2d Cir. 2005)   Cited 246 times
    Holding that "the intention to breach does not give rise to a duty to disclose. Instead, the duty to disclose must exist separately from the duty to perform under the contract" (citing Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Recovery Credit Servs., Inc., 98 F.3d 13, 20 (2d Cir. 1996))
  8. High Tides Llc v. Demichele

    88 A.D.3d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 180 times
    Holding that statements "which amount to no more than vague expressions of hope and future expectation," or which are "mere opinion and puffery," "provide an insufficient basis upon which to predicate a claim of fraud." (quotations, alterations and citations omitted)
  9. Interpharm Inc. v. Bank

    655 F.3d 136 (2d Cir. 2011)   Cited 163 times
    Holding that, in a breach of contract action, the document on which the complaint is based is "by definition [] integral to the complaint"
  10. Channel Master Corp. v. Aluminium Limited Sales, Inc.

    4 N.Y.2d 403 (N.Y. 1958)   Cited 728 times
    Holding plaintiff seeking rescission of contract on ground of fraudulent inducement must establish "defendant knowingly uttered a falsehood intending to deprive the plaintiff of a benefit and that the plaintiff was thereby deceived and damaged"
  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 333,232 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  12. Section 1125 - False designations of origin, false descriptions, and dilution forbidden

    15 U.S.C. § 1125   Cited 15,533 times   324 Legal Analyses
    Holding "the person who asserts trade dress protection has the burden of proving that the matter sought to be protected is not functional"
  13. Section 203 - Method of computing periods of limitation generally

    N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 203   Cited 2,695 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Providing that, in an action commenced by filing, "a claim asserted in the complaint is interposed against the defendant" upon filing